Ari, Ari, Ari.... -- WASHINGTON BOARD

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, [6], 7, 8, 9, 10 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 14:50:34 03/05/02 Tue
Author: Donk-still-annoyed
Author Host/IP: 209.indianapolis-17rh15rt.in.dial-access.att.net / 12.85.0.209
Subject: Ari, Ari, Ari....

Watching Ari Fleischer skate around today -- can this group get any more subversive?! You know, Bush said he wanted to be a dictator and I think he'll get there in a odd, defacto way!

In the government, there was this strange joke -- sardonic I guess, involving civil defense planning. Like, if a few hundred thousand people were killed and 30% of a city were destroyed in a nuclear action, whatever would be the "normal" business of the nation and government???!!!

I mean, we lose less than 3000 (two months worth of car wreck fatalities) and some buildings, and we are redefined for the foreseeable future! Does the admin actually believe this stuff goes unnoticed by the adversaries or is the political mileage all that matters?

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

So let me get this straight -- Wilbs, 19:54:53 03/05/02 Tue
- Well, you didn't...want to try again? -- Donk, 20:23:02 03/05/02 Tue
  - why don't you get to your point and state it clearly -- Larsen, 13:56:24 03/06/02 Wed
    - I do and I did.... -- Donk, 15:27:30 03/06/02 Wed
      - I am unaffected by your ineffective post although I do comprehend... -- Larsen, 17:16:37 03/06/02 Wed
        I hooked you...n/t (NT) -- Donk, 18:40:17 03/06/02 Wed
        please explain how you hooked me -- Larsen, 13:42:57 03/07/02 Thu
        Of course you don't, but we weren't mincing.... -- Donk, 19:38:49 03/07/02 Thu