Re: Touchy Subject..... Better left unsaid? -- WASHINGTON BOARD

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, [6], 7, 8, 9, 10 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 17:26:35 03/11/02 Mon
Author: Grumpy�
Author Host/IP: 155-41.poccpe.cableone.net / 24.116.155.41
Subject: Re: Touchy Subject..... Better left unsaid?
In reply to: Donk 's message, "Touchy Subject..... Better left unsaid?" on 09:31:16 03/11/02 Mon

Sensationalism boosts ratings, to be blunt about it. "America At War" always implies that new revelations about the battlefield are at hand; it's Clinton, Gingrich, Condit and Bush all rolled up together.

"Ah, the good old days of Iran-Contra hearings, Watergate, the Imperial Presidency, the Pentagon Papers - now those sold!"

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Re: Touchy Subject..... Better left unsaid? -- Southern Gent, 22:00:51 03/11/02 Mon

For sure, SG.... -- Donk, 15:18:17 03/12/02 Tue

Re: Touchy Subject..... Better left unsaid? -- Interested Awareness, 16:42:40 03/12/02 Tue