Re: A friend sent me this and I thought it was worth sharing -- WASHINGTON BOARD

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, [8], 9, 10 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 02:04:10 02/19/02 Tue
Author: Normal
Author Host/IP: modem16-29.mo-net.com / 12.110.236.42
Subject: Re: A friend sent me this and I thought it was worth sharing
In reply to: Southern Gent 's message, "A friend sent me this and I thought it was worth sharing" on 19:57:30 02/18/02 Mon

Bush 2, America's 2nd choice for President in 2000.

Well here we are in the tijuana jail.
Ain't got no friends....

All my Friends are blissfully and willfully ignorant. Except for you people. I would feel so alone if not for the internet. You say a word against our second choice president around here and you get such a stonyeyed glare, and "We have to keep this from happening again". Stuff like that.

I heard that Scalia has been suggesting that Catholic Judges resign, because the Catholic Church opposes the death penalty. This signifies to me that he places church above all. He says that he need not resign because his views reflect the views of the founders. They called it "Originality" (original intent) I think. Supposed to mean that his interpretation of "Constutionality" is determined by the views of the Founders. Seems he thinks the founders were all protestant.

So since the founders did not support abortion, does that mean it could be ruled against? What about the founders opinion on women's rights? Hmmmm? Civil rights? Slavery?

So now we have Bush declaring open warfare on drug users by naming them terrorists. Speaking in newspeak about the "Axis of Evil", and the great "Crusade". Not to mention slapping China with Taiwan, out of the blue. We have Scalia saying Religion rules. Man don't you miss Sirica (sp?). Ashcroft saying whatever is good for number two and the police is good enough for America, by God. The media waving flags and showing plenty of patriotic movies and documentaries.

"Bow down, go on, bow down to the King of Filth, the King of Slime, the King of Putresence. His true love lives, yet he would wed another"

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Outstanding! -- Donk, 12:26:01 02/19/02 Tue

Sadly, that is true -- Southern Gent, 17:33:47 02/19/02 Tue