Britney's Beauties Predictions -- Photo contest predictions GBU

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, [4] ]

Subject: Britney's Beauties Predictions

Author:
JMO

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 18:58:34 01/29/02 Tue
Author Host/IP: 172.134.159.113

My picks were way off from a couple of other predictions I read. I guess that goes to show you these photo contests are all just an opinion....Speaking of Opinions...Here's mine.

Overall Supreme Danielle (9-12)
Mini Supreme Courtney 1 (4 yr)

Age Divisions
0-4 Madison
5-6 Alison
7-9 Macy Lauren
10-12 Morgan Grace
13-23 Maddison Jayde
2 yr Carolina
3 yr Mariah Lynn
4 yr Lauren
5 yr Kashleigh Ann
6-8 Mia Lynn
9-12 Laura
13-16 Kassie
17-Up Sonia

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

[> Subject: Going with the NATURALS??
Author: Question [ Edit \| View ]	Date Posted: 07:18:31 01/30/02 Wed Author Host/IP: 64.12.101.184

[> [> Subject: Re: Going with the NATURALS??
Author: ??? [ Edit \| View ]	Date Posted: 12:51:00 01/30/02 Wed Author Host/IP: 168.191.204.110 Someone doesn't like pageant kids. This is that type of contest though.

[> [> Subject: RE: I am from the south, I LOVE pageant photos...But that is not the criteria listed on the site! I chose the most beautiful (IMO) whether it be pageant photo or not.
Author: Just following the rules. [ Edit \| View ]	Date Posted: 15:15:33 01/30/02 Wed Author Host/IP: 172.146.17.19 >Someone doesn't like pageant kids. This is that type >of contest though.

[> [> Subject: I just went back and looked again just to be certain of your statement...The only thing in my opinion that might be subjective is that Lauren of 4's is just as much mini as Courtney 1 so whoever doesn't get that would get age group. Other than that, I only saw 1 other category (3's that the pageant pic I didn't pic...other child prettier IMO). Other than that, I don't see any other "Pageant Pictures".

Author:
If those didn't cover it, please tell me which ones you think are pageant pictures.
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 15:28:33 01/30/02 Wed
Author Host/IP: 172.146.17.19

>Someone doesn't like pageant kids. This is that type
>of contest though.

[> Subject: These are pageant picture 10-12 Chloe , Amber or Megan, 13-23 Kylie, 3 Kayla,6-8 Cassy, 13-16 Ravayna Hmmmmmmm Seems that you didn't pick a lot of pageant ? Naturals is what you stuck with
Author: Myopinion on the poster [ Edit \| View ]	Date Posted: 17:41:31 01/30/02 Wed Author Host/IP: 152.163.207.49

[> [> Subject: Re: I went and looked at ones you pointed out...IMO the only ones that would be "pageant pics" would be as I state before Kayla 3 & then MAYBE Ravayna 13-16. The other pics were bad (maybe not all the following) bad eye contact, grainy, hair is messy, one girl looks angry and the other looks like a boy (younger girl). Where I am from, those certainly would NOT be considered pageant pictures!!

Author:
JMO
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 18:39:00 01/30/02 Wed
Author Host/IP: 172.132.176.101

[> [> [> Subject: I honestly think you don't have any idea what your looking at-LOL All these children are beautiful!
Author: Tired of Ignorant Posts [ Edit \| View ]	Date Posted: 06:07:42 02/01/02 Fri Author Host/IP: 152.163.207.182

[> [> [> [> Subject: Re: And where in my post did you see that I said they weren't beautiful? Someone said these were "Pageant Pictures" and I stated except for one (3 yr olds where I thought other child was prettier OPINION) that they weren't really pageant photos. Being beautiful has nothing to do with bad eye contact, grainy photos, messy hair and bad facial expressions. Bottom line is ... SORRY, I didn't pick YOUR child because I don't think they were the most beautiful in the age group.

Author:
That is however JMO
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 07:21:23 02/01/02 Fri
Author Host/IP: 172.153.81.145

[> [> [> [> [> Subject: Funny part is you did pick my child
Author: if you must know [ Edit \| View ]	Date Posted: 07:38:10 02/01/02 Fri Author Host/IP: 64.12.103.181

[> [> [> [> [> [> Subject: Re: So, you think I didn't know what I was looking at because I PICKED YOUR CHILD??? That is the only way I can interpret that statement.
Author: SOM [ Edit \| View ]	Date Posted: 16:57:14 02/03/02 Sun Author Host/IP: 172.147.243.250

[> Subject: Poster doesn't like the looks of pageant kids
Author: IMO [ Edit \| View ]	Date Posted: 17:43:48 01/30/02 Wed Author Host/IP: 152.163.207.49