Re: Shimmering Stars Winners? -- Photo contest predictions GBU

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, [4] ]

Subject: Re: Shimmering Stars Winners?

Author:
Kim, Shimmering Stars Owner

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 07:54:46 02/06/02 Wed
Author Host/IP: 205.188.199.176
In reply to: curious mom 's message, "Re: Shimmering Stars Winners?" on 19:41:53 02/05/02 Tue

Yes, I realize that a lot of what you are saying is true. That is why I use 2 judges of my own (usually my friends or family who have absolutely nothing to do with online photo contests). Points are also deducted from the final score if the contestant is wearing "painted on" make-up (based on age.....meaning we are more tolerant of the older girls with make-up). I have nothing against make-up or pageant photos (my daughter was once a pageant kid too until she decided she no longer wanted to participate) but I feel the make-up should be kept to a minimum and used only to enhance your natural beauty and not to change your appearance drastically. I have seen pageant photos and snapshots of the same kids and if I didn't know better I'd say they were two entirely different children. I instruct my judges to base their opinions on natural facial beauty and personality. As far as letting certain kids win so that my child can win in their mother's contest is absolutely untrue in as much as my daughter no longer participates in pageants or photo contests. In fact, that is the whole reason I started Shimmering Stars.....because I was having "pageant mom" withdrawals. LOL Just know that each month we have at least 5-8 judges, 2-3 of which are in no way related to pageants or contests. If anyone has suggestions on making the contest more fair, then please let me know. I meant it when I said I want to run a FAIR contest for ALL children.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

[> [> [> [> Subject: Suggestion-Why don't you make a snap shot/Pro Category? Kaitlin's did and it seems to be working great!
Author: FLPageantMommy [ Edit \| View ]	Date Posted: 08:25:44 02/06/02 Wed Author Host/IP: 152.163.206.189

[> [> [> [> [> Subject: Re: Suggestion-Why don't you make a snap shot/Pro Category? Kaitlin's did and it seems to be working great!

Author:
Kim, Shimmering Stars
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 15:57:56 02/06/02 Wed
Author Host/IP: 152.163.201.194

I tried this a while back. I divided the contest up into three categories....glam, studio, and snapshot. It was a total disaster! I had asked everyone to classify their photo for me; if no indication was made I'd put it where I thought it best belonged. Well, as you know, sometimes it is hard to tell a good enhancement from a glam shot, etc. When the winners were posted I had complaints from everywhere...."my photo would have done better if it was classified right....blah, blah". I finally said "enough" and that's when I started cropping all photos to the head and placing them in one category again. Either way I go, somebody is complaining! Any more suggestions?