Date Posted:08:14:06 06/04/04 Fri Author: former Subject: Re: How Can Paul Hong Say This With a Straight Face? In reply to:
Joe
's message, "Re: How Can Paul Hong Say This With a Straight Face?" on 11:44:39 06/03/04 Thu
If the people who have spoken
>up about UBF in the past and present (and future) are
>just a bunch of "conspiracy nuts," then it seems that
>they are very believable "conspiracy nuts," with whom
>respected cult experts like Rick Ross, the media,
>mainstream clergy and even the NAE seem to agree."
I really like this point you made. The other issue is that these alledged "conspiracy nuts" seem to originate among the most devoted, responsible, and long time members of UBF such as Peter Chang and James Kim. If these leaders who have been bringing up essentially the same points since 1976 are mere "conspiracy nuts" then UBF has to answer the question as to why it has such a propensity to raise up so many paranoid neurotics and pathological liars and place them in high positions of leadership and tolerate them for so many years?
