VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 123[4]5678910 ]
Subject: This sort of thing makes me very angry


Author:
James M
[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]
Date Posted: Sun, April 20, 2008 1:28:05
In reply to: Tommymittenz 's message, "Non-Muslims banned from pool in England" on Sun, April 20, 2008 10:56:50

I refer to the selection of complete idiots from the scores of people who would have applied in the recruitment process for a position that was taken by one or possibly two cretins.

I did a little investigating into this story and learnt that the men only swimming Session was introduced, at the behest of the Muslim community, to the centre, just as a women only session had been timetabled at the behest of the Hasidic Jewish community over a year ago (http://hurryupharry.bloghouse.net/archives/2008/01/20/single_sex_swimming_religious_minorities_and_antidiscrimination.php).

Just as the women only session is not for the exclusive use of Jews, the men only session was not for the the exclusive use of Muslims but the three-brain-celled being whose hands the human resource department shook and gave a job found the turn of events a little too hard to follow. Of course no such exclusion would be legal for such a municipal building. It does not say whether the person who made the following comment that if there was 'sufficient demand' a whites only session could also be introduced was the same as the first but, if not, this person is clearly of the same ilk.

I might start a 'hiring a complete f#*king idiot award' and give the first award to GLL Human Resources.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:
Subject Author Date
Terrific post! (NT)Thank youTue, May 06, 2008 2:07:24
Controlling anger before it controls youPerhaps this well help you, James. The first step is acknowledging you have a problem. You have taken that step. Good.Tue, May 06, 2008 2:11:25


[ Contact Forum Admin ]


Forum timezone: GMT-8
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.