[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement:
Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor
of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users'
privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your
privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket
to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we
also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.
Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your
contribution is not tax-deductible.)
PayPal Acct: 
Feedback: 
Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):
| Tuesday, May 07, 01:03:36am |
[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search |
Check update time
| Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, [5], 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 ]
|
[ Next Thread |
Previous Thread |
Next Message |
Previous Message ]
Date Posted: 14:41:01 07/20/04 Tue
Author: HC1843
Subject: Parliament...Big Ben...Parliament...Big Ben...
In reply to:
NTKHC64
's message, "Re: School's Athletic Board-Summer Hiatus?" on 14:11:01 07/20/04 Tue
Ever get the feeling like we've been here before. NTK, the fact of the matter is that unless or until Dick Regan connects the state of the Athletics website with yearly raises, the motivation levels to do anything even mediocre with the site will be one that would have made the Soviet's proud.
Quite honestly, what is in it for anyone in the athletic department to care about the embarassing state of the website when it appears that Dick Regan could not give a hoot. Until DR cares, no one will care. Why Mr. Regan allows such a poor reflection of the schools athletic department, and thus himself, to continue is beyond me...oh wait, "budget constraints". Nevermind, I forgot about that excuse.
Cheers.
[
Next Thread |
Previous Thread |
Next Message |
Previous Message
]
Replies:
[> [> [> [> [> [>
Answer from HC !! -- pitt65, 15:55:48 07/20/04 Tue
The reason I tried the athletic dept. on the HC board [despite the summer hiatus] was that I saw some mid-July releases about assistant coaches. I got an e-mail back from Larry Napolitano which reads as follows:
"I have forwarded your message onto our athletic director. As far as I am aware no official decision has been made by the ECAC regarding possible expansion. We have applied but they have not denied or accepted our application as of yet. Anything you have heard regarding Quinnipiac or anyone else being accepted is not accurate. To my knowledge, there has not been any formal invitations extended to join the conference."
[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[ Edit | View ]
[> [> [> [> [> [> [>
Re: Answer from HC !! -- kesiwick, 16:05:11 07/20/04 Tue
they should demand a retraction from the Telegram for their erroneous headline last week !
[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[ Edit | View ]
[> [> [> [> [> [> [> [>
Re: What the T&G Stated -- NTKHC64, 16:15:15 07/20/04 Tue
"The ECAC athletic directors committee has recommended Quinnipiac as it 12th member institution to replace Vermont...The recommendation will now go before the ECAC's policy committee which will have ultimate approval, and a final decision is expected later this month. There is a chance the policy committee could go in a different direction, but that is not likely."
The headline in the online edition was "ECAC says no to HC."
[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[ Edit | View ]
[> [> [> [> [> [> [>
Re: Answer from HC !! -- NTKHC64, 16:10:32 07/20/04 Tue
The majority of the ECAC ADs recommended Quinnipiac as its top choice. The ECAC Policy Committee could reject the suggestion so technically the reply is correct.
[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[ Edit | View ]
[> [> [> [> [> [> [> [>
Re: Answer from HC !! -- pitt65, 16:27:16 07/20/04 Tue
NTK: Any more info - eg. Was the AD decision by a large or bare majority? Will our Administration be given a chance to go before the ECAC policy committee? -etc.
[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[ Edit | View ]
