Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your
contribution is not tax-deductible.)
PayPal Acct:
Feedback:
Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):
| Monday, May 11, 02:53:30am | [ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, [8], 9, 10 ] |
[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[ Edit | View ]
[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[ Edit | View ]
Re: Fingleton Gone -- purple passion peter, 22:29:42 06/30/04 Wed
[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[ Edit | View ]
[> [> [>
Re: Fingleton Gone -- Ray, 23:33:40 06/30/04 Wed
Nice to have your always-classy presence here again, ppp.
[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[ Edit | View ]
[> [> [>
PPP's Posts -- zipp, 09:27:13 07/01/04 Thu
I've noticed a peculiar pattern to the frequency and timing of the PPP's posts. Similar to that of a prison work release program, the full moon and/or coinciding with when the circus comes to town. Although, this may be purely a coincidence.
[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[ Edit | View ]
[> [>
Women's player - Dahlman -- Jon, 19:49:41 07/01/04 Thu
hc83 - Meg Dahlman has transferred out.
[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[ Edit | View ]
[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[ Edit | View ]
[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[ Edit | View ]
[> [> [>
Re: Fingleton Gone (From US Basket-Coll. BB 5/7/04 -- MHMD, 21:48:12 07/05/04 Mon
While I very much appreciate Fingleton's character and wish he and his family well, the kid clearly was nothing more then a very soft 7 ft. 5 local kid HC HAD to take. His skills were D2 at best and if he plays anywhere they better have a seat on the bench at least every other game... he may want to play but has as much feel for the game as Herman Munster.
[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[ Edit | View ]
[> [> [> [>
Fingleton Gone (From US Basket-Coll. BB 5/7/04 -- sader1970, 22:06:00 07/05/04 Mon
Having seen most of the minutes that Neil played in a HC uniform, I disagree that he had no talent. While there was no doubt he was rough and wasn't a natural born BB player, I thought he was athletic the few times he wasn't hurting. The one game I did not see him play, might have been his best from those who did watch - against BC. Listening to the game on the radio, he blocked shots in two successive BC possessions against their highly touted big men. At least one source from the athletic dept. said to me that they felt that was his big game and that they thought Neil was coming into his own and then the injuries came back.
If Neil can keep himself healthy and get some regular playing time against good competition, I think a lot of people will be surprised. But I'll be the first to admit, there are a lot of "ifs" and "caveats" in my comments.
[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[ Edit | View ]
[> [> [> [> [>
Re: Fingleton Gone (From US Basket-Coll. BB 5/7/04 -- Jimbo, 22:47:24 07/05/04 Mon
And, don't forget the Princeton game at home 2 seasons ago.
[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[ Edit | View ]
[> [> [> [> [>
Re: Fingleton Gone (From US Basket-Coll. BB 5/7/04 -- MHMD, 21:35:45 07/06/04 Tue
Hey.. the kid may be 7 foot 5....a great person... terrific student... have a love for the game.... but has the athletic ability and athletic toughness of a flea...let's remain realistic here...the kid will not be missed in this program-basketball wise that is.
[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[ Edit | View ]
[> [> [> [> [>
Fingleton Gone -- sader1970, 06:04:11 07/07/04 Wed
MH, as far as his consistent impact on HC basketball, I agree with you. However, whenever he made an appearance, there was an impact on the fans. Neil was especially loved by the Worcester fans and you could feel the excitement and that the whole Hart center was rooting for this kid to do well. We never got to see a long-term, healthy Neil. Whether he was tough enough is something the rest of us can only conjecture on, we weren't in his situation. As for athletic ability, I think he DID have it, and may have it again, but not in a Crusader uniform. I had earlier posted where I had calculated the rebounds and blocks per minute played for the team. Neil was tied with Nate for the team lead in rebounds per minute played (admittedly playing a lot fewer minutes) at .20 rebounds per minute played (K Ham, Joe Young and Keith had .18 rebounds per minute played). But, just as people would have wanted of a 7' 6" player, an indication of Neil's ability to impact a game on defense was the blocks per minute played. Neil had .115 blocks per minute played with Kevin Hyland next highest at .073 and Nate a distant third at .049.
[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[ Edit | View ]
[> [> [> [> [> [>
Re: Fingleton Gone -- MHMD, 13:18:26 07/07/04 Wed
Great points Sader and you are right... Willard was in a NO WIN situation- if he takes him and it doesn't work out it's too bad.. if he doesn't take him Worcester is up in arms. I look at athleticism like this.. if Neil were 6 ft. 7 instead of 7 ft 6 would he have had enough to play for the Cross?? I personally don't think so. Look at Shaq.. if that guy were 6 ft. 7 he'd still be a very good player... Lastly, being a great kid, outstanding student, and a genuinely nice kid is far more important than being able to rebound... and he clearly is all of that.
[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[ Edit | View ]
[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[ Edit | View ]
[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[ Edit | View ]
[> [> [>
Before we jump Fingleton for the $120K HC spent... -- sader1970, 13:49:43 07/07/04 Wed
1843, you are right on the mark as far as I'm concerned. And as MH indicated above, we HAD to take Neil. He probably wasn't considered much of a gamble being 7' 6" (warning, cliche ahead: "you can't teach height"), a McDonald's All American (how many has HC gotten of those over the years?) and a kid that was a local high school legend. This doesn't even consider the kid was obviously bright enough to make the grade academically at HC and would help fill the Hart Center.
As for football, I can't begin to tell you how happy I am with Coach Gilmore. I have been unhappy with the direction of the football program for some time and felt a change should have been made, conservatively, 5 years ago. I know, it's better "never late" but it's still better "late than never."
[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[ Edit | View ]
[> [> [> [>
Before we jump Fingleton for the $120K HC spent... -- TS1970, 15:55:22 07/07/04 Wed
"...the kid was obviously bright enough to make the grade academically at HC and would help fill the Hart Center."
I also heartily agree accepting Neil was the correct move at the time and certainly worth the small risk HC took in offering him an athletic scholarship. No one really had a crystal ball to predict that he would continue to be plagued with chronic injury and back problems. As stated above by Sader1970, Neil was also "bright enough..." that I am sure many believed he could be instructed to learn and acquire the basketball skills needed to play in the PL for HC. Of course, at 7' 6" and 300 pounds, had he learned to consistently execute those athletic skills, he could have conceivably dominated the PL (ala Josh Sankes) for two and a half years. So for these reasons and the reasons expressed by others here, I say yes, it was worth it to give a shot to the tallest player in HC history and, I believe at the time, the tallest in the nation. I think it was really a no brainer under the circumstances. However, unfortunately again, the HC BB program was hit with some bad luck and disappointment with regard to Neil's progress and his health so things just did not work out the way we all had hoped. So now we move on and so does the big fella Neil, Class of 2004.
[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[ Edit | View ]
[> [>
Re: Fingleton scollie issue -- Rick, 14:35:53 07/07/04 Wed
nyc -
I'm not sure I understand your question on 'accountability' with Neil's athletic scholarship. I'm assuming your saying HC/Willard should not have accepted him into the program as a transfer, yes ?
1843 -
" I'll take the 120k bet on Fingleton "
Athletic scholarships are annually renewed. AIR, Neil was with the team for 2 years, correct ? At roughly $35,000 per, isn't that around $70,000 that Neil received ?
[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[ Edit | View ]
[> [> [>
Re: Fingleton scollie issue -- Wasn't this addressed before....?, 17:15:31 07/07/04 Wed
This board rumored that HC admin was NOT going to renew Neil's schollie with only 2 courses left to graduate. Any truth to this? Does this even make sense?
[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[ Edit | View ]
[> [> [>
Re: Fingleton scollie issue -- sader1970, 17:57:45 07/07/04 Wed
Since Neil took his two remaining courses over this summer and is supposed to be gone already, there would be no reason to renew a scholarship for a student who no longer attends the college. I think it was previously posted that this is no longer an issue, only whether HC would use this extra scholarship this coming year. However, my recollection was that reliable sources indicated that there was no one that warranted getting a scholarship so it would be going unused.
[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[ Edit | View ]