Re: All this for nothing -- Utah's Religion Debate

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, [2], 3 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 05:04:27 06/01/06 Thu
Author: Bob Blaylock
Subject:

Re: All this for nothing
In reply to: Lord Veritas 's message, "All this for nothing" on 15:48:08 03/16/06 Thu

No one said that marriage was bad. I only stated that there is no evidence that Christ was married whatsoever. The argument that it was plausible for him to get married is irrelevant, since just because something is plausible does not mean that it happened. It is plausible that the Germans and the axis powers could have won World War II. But the fact is that they didn't, and, unless someone can prove the contrary, the fact is that Christ wasn't married.

��There is no significant evidence one way or the other.� There is no significant evidence that Jesus was married, nor is there any significant evidence that he was not.

��For you to state that ��unless someone can prove the contrary, the fact is that Christ wasn't married� is illogical.� If someone else were to state, ��unless someone can prove the contrary, the fact is that Christ was married�, both statements would be equally wrong.� The fact is, we don't know whether he was married or not.� Lack of proof that one possibility is correct does not mean that the other equally-unproven possibility must be correct.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]