Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your
contribution is not tax-deductible.)
PayPal Acct:
Feedback:
Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):
| [ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, [2] ] |
| Subject: Re: Nine and possibly 10 bad kitty lists and only 3 bad dogs!!! | |
Author: Kathyrn | [ Next Thread |
Previous Thread |
Next Message |
Previous Message
] Date Posted: 23:26:43 06/14/00 Wed Author Host/IP: proxy-336.public.rwc.webtv.net/209.240.200.36 In reply to: NCLS Cody (Latest site review) 's message, "Nine and possibly 10 bad kitty lists and only 3 bad dogs!!!" on 15:54:10 06/10/00 Sat > This rel=nofollow target=_blank > href="http://www.geocities.com/bad_pets/BadPets/BadFerr > et.html"> Bad Pets site is low on porportionality > and high on congeniality dear fiends, I mean > "friends"!!! I have no problem with the concept that > cats are, at least, three times worse than dogs. It > looks like badgers fare the best, since there isn't a > "bad badger" page 2 B found anywhere. Your link lead me to the bad ferret page in their selection of lists. I think someone has way too much time on their hands! LOL! And personally I think cats just don't care what anyone things which tends to annoy control freaks! But I think when dogs do damage or are bad the ramiications are much more severe than those of a cat. [ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ] |
| [> [> Subject: Re: Nine and possibly 10 bad kitty lists and only 3 bad dogs!!! | |
|
Author: johnathan juckus [ Edit | View ] |
Date Posted: 12:46:35 05/31/01 Thu Author Host/IP: NoHost/198.234.229.84 >> This rel=nofollow target=_blank >> >href="http://www.geocities.com/bad_pets/BadPets/BadFerr >> et.html"> Bad Pets site is low on porportionality >> and high on congeniality dear fiends, I mean >> "friends"!!! I have no problem with the concept that >> cats are, at least, three times worse than dogs. It >> looks like badgers fare the best, since there isn't a >> "bad badger" page 2 B found anywhere. > >Your link lead me to the bad ferret page in their >selection of lists. I think someone has way too much >time on their hands! LOL! >And personally I think cats just don't care what >anyone things which tends to annoy control freaks! >But I think when dogs do damage or are bad the >ramiications are much more severe than those of a cat. [ Post a Reply to This Message ] |
| [> [> [> Subject: Re: Nine and possibly 10 bad kitty lists and only 3 bad dogs!!! | |
|
Author: barend [ Edit | View ] |
Date Posted: 15:37:46 05/28/03 Wed Author Host/IP: pc1-pete2-4-cust112.pete.cable.ntl.com/80.3.141.112 >>> This rel=nofollow target=_blank >>> >>href="http://www.geocities.com/bad_pets/BadPets/BadFer >r >>> et.html"> Bad Pets site is low on >porportionality >>> and high on congeniality dear fiends, I mean >>> "friends"!!! I have no problem with the concept that >>> cats are, at least, three times worse than dogs. It >>> looks like badgers fare the best, since there isn't >a >>> "bad badger" page 2 B found anywhere. >> >>Your link lead me to the bad ferret page in their >>selection of lists. I think someone has way too much >>time on their hands! LOL! >>And personally I think cats just don't care what >>anyone things which tends to annoy control freaks! >>But I think when dogs do damage or are bad the >>ramiications are much more severe than those of a cat. [ Post a Reply to This Message ] |