A clarification on an old religion & public schools discussion -- Adilbrand Noblesword's Hall of Warriors

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, [6], 7, 8, 9, 10 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 15:43:00 06/16/03 Mon
Author: Mt. Healthy Mountaineer
Subject:

A clarification on an old religion & public schools discussion

This was in a magazine I received a while back. It reminded me of a discussion we had last year. Rather than drag the whole discussion back up to the top of the pile, here is a link to my answer to someone's convoluted understanding of this issue: click here.

The Department of Education has recently issued a new set of guidelines, as required by the "No Child Left Behind Act" of 2001. Their interpretation so completely dovetails with my previous understanding that I was, quite frankly, a little surprised.

Here is a link to the Department of Education's webpage clarifying this issue:

Link to religion and public school webpage (start with the paragraph entitled "Overview of Governing Constitutional Principles)A/A>

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

A good Summary -- I'm surprised there was any confusion! (NT) -- Bob, 16:01:06 06/17/03 Tue
- Me too... -- Mt. Healthy Mountaineer, 18:47:28 06/17/03 Tue
  - Hmmm -- mvd, 19:24:50 06/17/03 Tue
    - freedeom of speech is not popular with you, huh? (NT) -- Mt. Healthy Mountaineer, 02:31:15 06/19/03 Thu
      - Freedom of speech -- mvd, 13:05:23 06/19/03 Thu
        just yankin' your chain (NT) -- mt. healthy mountaineer, 13:24:32 06/19/03 Thu
        okay (NT) -- mvd, 13:39:36 06/19/03 Thu