VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, [2], 3 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 08:51:14 11/18/00 Sat
Author: Stacy McArdle
Subject: PHOTO SKEPTICISM

THIS MESSAGE WAS CONTRIBUTED TO OUR 'VIEWS' SECTION,
WHICH WE NO LONGER HAVE. THUS, I HAVE TRANSFERRED IT
TO THE FORUM.


I'm going to make this brief, get the general idea across. I, as well as others in the field, receive a lot of e-mail stating that all possible ghost photos are fake simply because they CAN be faked or because other objects/conditions can create similar images. To make that statement is absolutely ridiculous. I can build a model home to represent my real home, being darn near
exact. Does that mean my actual home does not exist, because I manufactured a similar image? Many different, unrelated
objects can create a similar image on film. As far as dishonesty goes, there are frauds in every field ... unfortunately. Regarding my posted photos, I state that I simply cannot explain them. Also, labeling something as an 'orb' or 'mist' doesn't make the claim that they DEFINITELY represent the images of "ghosts". You can't just look at a photo on the web to determine it's authenticity either.When I
say that these photos are unexplainable, that means under the conditions & situations they were taken in. Simply looking at a globe photo on the web, for example, without knowing the whole story behind it will obviously not be convincing enough. So, when you see these possible "ghost" photos, please keep this in mind. It's essential to be skeptical but also keep an open mind.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

[> houses -- cara, 07:20:09 01/21/01 Sun

I am trying to find sites on haunted places such as the hill house and chillington palace. I cant seem to find any. I also am looking for info on a man named John Sage who was the tortorous in the palace. Can you help?


[ Edit | View ]


[ Contact Forum Admin ]

Forum timezone: GMT-8
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.