VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, [3] ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 16:08:48 02/22/02 Fri
Author: Albatross
Author Host/IP: 193.130.28.1
Subject: Re: Kidsgrove keeper
In reply to: Saints fan 's message, "Re: Kidsgrove keeper" on 10:57:23 02/22/02 Fri

>surely it is best to have two quality goalkeepers
>instead one just the one.

I don't think anyone's disagreeing with that; I think what they're saying (certainly what I think) is that it's difficult to keep two quality 'Keepers happy when one of them is always likely to be on the bench or out of the side. Goalkeeper is a strange position like this, it doesn't apply the same way to Midfielders etc. I was very surprised when Richard Wright went to Arsenal for example, knowing that he'd be competing with his England Colleague Seaman.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]
[ Contact Forum Admin ]

Forum timezone: GMT+0
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.