Name (required):

  Expression ^{(Optional mood/title along with your name) Examples: (happy, sad, The Joyful, etc.) help)}

  E-mail address (required):

* Type your message here:
>> Give it a break! >> >> Isnt there diversified methods with conventional >golf. >> >Yeah, and one could rationalize that NG is in reality >one of them! > >> There are books out there and instructors that are >> teaching at u from every different angle. > >So I guess we get the "same old", "same old" with NG >too? > >> >> We arent going to all be able to swing exactly alike >> anyway so its nice to see it taught from differnt >> angles and we can all adopt what suits us best. > >Teaching it simaltaneously as a pusher or puller swing >is nonsense, same with the straight back takeaway >versus Moes, inside and up backswing, which is it, we >can't include every swing nuance can we?? > >> >> My son plays hockey and is a quote 'butterfly style >> goalie' >> he happens to be very flexible so he can get into >> positons other goalies cant dream of so to get the >> same result they have to compromise there leg >> positions in a different way, that doesnt make it >> wrong. > >And a Olympic swimmer doesn't train on how to do the >Australian crawl if he's going to be in a back stroke >competetion! > >> >> As golfers are swings are also going to look very >> different depending on our body styles. > >Why not just say that Gary Player and Allen Doyle are >natural golfers too, seems any and every swing can be >a "variation"! > >CTunflog (that's golfnut spelled backwards!)

Notice: Copies of your message may remain on this and other systems on internet. Please be respectful.