Re: Diversified methods? -- Single-Axis Golf Forum Archives

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 23:52:23 07/13/00 Thu
Author: CTunflog
Subject: Re: Diversified methods?
In reply to: Upnorth 's message, "Re: NG's only ideology is.........." on 13:41:30 07/13/00 Thu

> Give it a break!
>
> Isnt there diversified methods with conventional golf.
>
Yeah, and one could rationalize that NG is in reality one of them!

> There are books out there and instructors that are
> teaching at u from every different angle.

So I guess we get the "same old", "same old" with NG too?

>
> We arent going to all be able to swing exactly alike
> anyway so its nice to see it taught from differnt
> angles and we can all adopt what suits us best.

Teaching it simaltaneously as a pusher or puller swing is nonsense, same with the straight back takeaway versus Moes, inside and up backswing, which is it, we can't include every swing nuance can we??

>
> My son plays hockey and is a quote 'butterfly style
> goalie'
> he happens to be very flexible so he can get into
> positons other goalies cant dream of so to get the
> same result they have to compromise there leg
> positions in a different way, that doesnt make it
> wrong.

And a Olympic swimmer doesn't train on how to do the Australian crawl if he's going to be in a back stroke competetion!

>
> As golfers are swings are also going to look very
> different depending on our body styles.

Why not just say that Gary Player and Allen Doyle are natural golfers too, seems any and every swing can be a "variation"!

CTunflog (that's golfnut spelled backwards!)

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]