Re: It's interesting. -- Final End

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, [2], 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 15:53:57 03/20/03 Thu
Author: The Serpent
Subject: Re: It's interesting.
In reply to: Drummond 's message, "Not to minimize" on 01:03:01 03/19/03 Wed

Can't help but notice that the Terror Alert Elevated back to Orange due to Curious George's ultimatum, and then, inevitable war.

Since we'll be so much safer after Saddam Hussein is out of power, we won't need Homeland Security and the blasted Patriot Act!

Riiiiiight.

Seems to me that even our own administration realizes that this war is going to bring nothing but trouble on down the road, therefore; we will be keeping our ever so B-Movie like Homeland Security, plus; we'll continue to upgrade the Patriot Act.

While this is going on, how many are willing to bet that, near to the next election, the Bush crowd is going to finally catch Osama bin Laden?

Either that, or the next person running for pres. (with those great corporate interests) is going to catch bin Laden right away, and boost his or her popularity, and thus, earning him or her another four long years - giving whoever that is eight years total.

God, it's been so gruelling since Reagan, then Bush, then Clinton, then back to another stupid fuckin' Bush. Do we really need another bomb-fanatic, economy sucking, corporate ruler?

Ugh.. Who will be our Nero?

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Wait...what was wrong with Clinton? -- Lona, 22:30:46 03/21/03 Fri
- Re: Wait...what was wrong with Clinton? -- sue, 15:13:19 04/05/03 Sat