Re: Ten years ago. I guess the O.J. trial wasn't going on then. -- Final End

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, [8], 9, 10 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 14:42:00 05/27/02 Mon
Author: The Serpent
Subject: Re: Ten years ago. I guess the O.J. trial wasn't going on then.
In reply to: Drummond 's message, "Well, we're talking about a population where the majority can't tell you how long it takes the earth to circle the sun" on 14:26:15 05/27/02 Mon

I think they zero in on the most, *ahem,* ignorant people so that we think society has become so brain-dead that, we have to rely on "them" in order to get anything done.

OR...

... that's what they get for taking money out of education and putting it into the drug war.

We've turned from Archie Buncker, to Beavis and Butt-Head, to Homer Simpson. To a lesser extent, we might even have a few Rambos running around. But, they get, *sigh* / *ha-ha,* results, right?

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]