Name (required):

  Expression ^{(Optional mood/title along with your name) Examples: (happy, sad, The Joyful, etc.) help)}

  E-mail address (optional):

* Type your message here:
>>>Ok, I've read back some through the forum, and it >>>looks like most people don't use the option defensive >>>fire rule. I've got some more MG-related >questions... >> >>Correct, most don't. If you insist, ASL is probably >>a better treatment. > >Firing as the units move seems more natural to me, as >opposed to time warping them back into the line of >fire, but I guess I should go with the masses on this >one. > >>>Are the provision of 17.7 (impact of MG fire beyond >>>originally targetted hex) in addition to the extra >>>penetration attacks in described in 17.5? >> >>Rule 17.7 is really about the special case of an >>LOS/LOF >>that goes directly down a hexside and how to treat >this >>case. > >Doh, that was my bad - I meant 17.6. I think I >understand it now, after reading what you wrote below. > >>In all cases, an MG will NEVER affect more target >hexes >>than its penetration factor (which is also its >>firepower >>factor), per rule 2.8 and details in 17.5. >> >>>Regarding 17.5 - are additional penetration attacks >>>only allowed between the firing hex and the original >>>target hex, along the line of fire? >> >>All penetration effects only occur in hexes along the >>established firing LOS. These penetration target >hexes >>may be between the firing MG and the target hex. And >>they MUST be in hexes beyond any that are targeted, up >>to the limit of the penetration factor. >> >>>Thanks, >>>- Nick >> >>I hope this helps! And if not, ask some more! > >I think I've got it now...but don't worry, I'm sure >I'll be back with some more questions shortly. > >Thanks, >- Nick

Notice: Copies of your message may remain on this and other systems on internet. Please be respectful.
The Voy.com User Agreement applies to all visitors.