Re: Two More Rule Questions (AAMG repair) -- Squad Leader Discussion Forum

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 08:43:34 05/31/06 Wed
Author: Alan Yngve
Subject: Re: Two More Rule Questions (AAMG repair)
In reply to: Adam 's message, "Two More Rule Questions" on 21:42:03 05/29/06 Mon

Adam asks:
>Is it necessary to be crew exposed to attempt
>repairing an AFV's AAMG?

Rules level ought to be specified here.

In SL rules, all MGs malfunction together and
all are repaired together. Nothing states that
CE status is required. (rules 38.1 and 38.2)

In COI and above rules, the different MGs of a
vehicle malfunction and repair separately. As
an unofficial answer, I believe that attempting
to repair an AA-MG would require CE status
when using COI or later rules sets, since doing
so is "using" the MG in a sense. Note that CE
requirements are specified in rule 66.43 and
64.44.

-- Alan

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]