Re: A Question and Discusion -- Squad Leader Discussion Forum

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 13:15:52 10/18/06 Wed
Author: Badger
Subject: Re: A Question and Discusion
In reply to: JaimeH 's message, "A Question and Discusion" on 12:07:18 10/16/06 Mon

Hi there

I play that they can make their own descisions independently from your combat choices.

Steve

>Hi Everyone,
>
>I'm finally playing solo the ALPHA1 TTS scenarios and
>getting on my way to enjoying SL once more!!
>
>I have a question a CLOSE COMBAT that doesn't seem
>clear to me. In 4th edition rules it states undeer
>rule 20.4 "You may divide your close combat attacks in
>any manner you wish as long as no unit attacks more
>than once per Close Combat phase."
>
>Yet in the example given is states "Both players could
>choose to divide their combat the following ways..."
>
>What I don't understand is if i'm the attacker with 3
>squads (4-6-7) against 3 squads (4-4-7), If i decide
>to make one attack 2 squads against 1 (2-1)and another
>1 against 1 attack (1-1), then is the defender
>obligated to the same attacks (1-3) and (1-1) or can
>the defender decide a totally diffrent approach (for
>example one 3-1 attack)? If the latter, is the rule
>realistic?
>Thanx
>James

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Re: A Question and Discusion -- Alan Yngve, 08:41:05 10/23/06 Mon