VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, [2], 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 04:02:40 12/14/02 Sat
Author: 5D FaT fAi
Subject: Re: ENG. LANG.PAPER 3
In reply to: MR. WILLIAM WONG 's message, "ENG. LANG.PAPER 3" on 02:18:02 12/14/02 Sat

>Dear F.5 students,
> First of all, I must apologize to all of you for
>the mistake I made in the Eng. Lang. Paper 3
>examination. The misunderstanding was due to the fact
>that I thought that the Eng. Lang. Paper 3 should last
>1 hr. 45 mins. as required by the HKCEE syllabus and
>according both to the examination timetable and the
>instruction sheet given to me together with the copies
>of datafile and the question-answer-books, it was
>clearly stated that the examination time should be
>8:30 - 10:15 a.m. I was not smart enough that I should
>follow the instruction given in the tape and I feel
>extremely sorry about that. Telling you the truth, I
>was at that time worrying about the arrangement of the
>Ch.Hist./Bio. examination of the second session
>because of the tight schedule. I know it is not your
>duty to point out the teacher's mistake during the
>examination and I am not blaming anyone, however, if
>one of you, out of 168 candidates, alerted me of my
>mistake when I made the " You have 15 minutes left"
>and the "You have 5 minutes left" announcements, the
>whole situation would be different. Anyway, I admit
>that I have made a serious mistake and I must say
>sorry once again. I brought the case to the English
>Panel Chairperson and the vice-principal right after
>the examination and they promised to do something
>about it after the marking of the papers though I knew
>the damage was already done.
> I sincerely hope that all of you would accept my
>apologies and this whole thing won't affect your
>spirit of trying your best and your will to success in
>your first term examination.
> Promise me to pass your examination with flying
>colours.
GD!I dun care wat u teachers will do for us , but i really appreciate u can come here to say sorry for us . As i said before , paper had been collected , we can do nth , but i still believe u apologizing to us is a very gd way to claim us down now . Of coz , some of us are still not satisfied (including me) , however , at least u apologized to us. So ... i hope F.5 buddies pls can stop writing messages about Mr. Wong and ... at least wait till the exam finished , we should believe teachers will do sth for us students .

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

[> [> Re: ENG. LANG.PAPER 3 -- 我, 06:57:44 12/14/02 Sat

我同意肥輝ge講法.....
考試都完左啦.....
你再埋怨結果都係一樣......
況且mr.wong都道左歉啦.....
佢都係跟考試instruction黎做je....無錯架....
你地如果真係咁緊張d成績就唔好係度噪....溫好d書咪仲實際啦...
如果你真係感到唔公平.....全級都係咁架啦...
你估淨係得你係咁啊......


[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> Re: ENG. LANG.PAPER 3 -- F.5B Lo Tak Kit, 10:01:31 12/14/02 Sat

First for all...please remind your words...i dont think that all of us are come here to agrue for the case...
o...no...it should be i totallly disagree with your words...we just give out our opinion here...
Second..i also disagree with you that mr wong follow instruction is equal to right...if yes...he need not to aplogize...and i mention again....i appericate his work...
Third...i dont think that everyone unfair is meaning that we are equal and fair to anyone....me is me...You is you...its nothing related...please remember ! maybe u are not so care about those few marks...but to me...i feel very important about that...and i havent said that its only me myself get this unfair result...


[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> [> Re: ENG. LANG.PAPER 3 -- HIN, 22:04:24 12/14/02 Sat

wow...this is my first time to post a message here.Y?just bec of i heard a apologize message from Mr. Wong through my friend.
i feel suprise that Mr.Wong is brave enough to do it.But it is just a apart of a correction u need to do..
in my pt of veiw..u should try ur best to decrease the bad effect cause by ur error...bec this exam result is a index to identify the student's HKCee grade...so it is quite important..that's y LOK TAK KIT so angry about it bec he didn't metion any about correction method in the case..
TALK NEXT TIME LA...NO TIME LA ME@#$@$@$@#BEC OF CHINESE HISTORY.......


[ Edit | View ]


[ Contact Forum Admin ]

Forum timezone: GMT-8
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.