Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your
contribution is not tax-deductible.)
PayPal Acct: 
Feedback: 
Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):
| [ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, [7] ] |
| Subject: Apology | |
|
Author: MerLyn |
[
Next Thread |
Previous Thread |
Next Message |
Previous Message
]
Date Posted: 21:37:17 03/04/02 Mon My first objective in my posts is to persuade dialogue analysts of all persuasions of the importance of polemical exchanges,and thereby to prompt them to apply to this kind of "dialogues" their analytical tools and skills. My second objective is to present a number of distinctions I have developed in the course of my research on polemical exchanges, in the hope that they provide a useful framework for further research on this topic. My third objective -- in fact, my "hidden agenda" -- is to propose new grounds and new objectives upon which a fruitful interdisciplinary dialogue between philosophical and empirical approaches to the study of dialogue can be reinstated. so if my rhetoric doth has offended anyone, please allow me to apologize. [ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ] |
| Subject | Author | Date |
| Re: Apology | cHiT-fACeD {FBC] | 21:45:21 03/04/02 Mon |
|
||
