Secret letters to DUP & PSF -- Stormont Watch

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, [6], 7, 8, 9, 10 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: Wed, Jan 23 2008, 16:53:05 PST
Author: St. Andrews' row
Subject: Secret letters to DUP & PSF

Protecting the Phoney peace in occupied Ireland
Posted on January 23, 2008 at 09:47:31 AM by justicethenpeace

Secret documents 'could undermine Northern Executive'
23/01/2008 - 14:04:20
http://www.breakingnews.ie/ireland/mheyojgbidgb/

The Northern Ireland Office (NIO) is withholding documents issued to the Democratic Unionists and Sinn F�in because of fears their release could destabilise Stormont�s power-sharing government, it was claimed today.

Traditional Unionist Voice MEP Jim Allister is to appeal to the Information Commissioner after the British government withheld documents he sought under the Freedom of Information Act between them and the two parties during and after the 2006 St Andrews talks.

The former DUP member, who quit the party last March over its power-sharing deal with Sinn F�in, said the NIO had justified its decision on the grounds that the documents� disclosure could undermine the new devolved arrangements.

�It has been specified to me by the NIO that the withheld information is contained in letters between ministers and the leaders of Sinn F�in and the DUP, which were issued 'at or following the St Andrews summit',� Mr Allister said.

�So, there are secret letters which passed from ministers to the Sinn F�in and DUP leaders which have not been made public and the reason is that their publication might cause 'prejudice to the effective conduct of the Northern Ireland Executive'.

�This causes me to believe that there may be letters unique and specific to the DUP and Sinn F�in, raising the public interest question of whether what has been said to each party by Her Majesty�s Government is compatible or consistent.

�Might this be the threat to the effective conduct of the Executive � namely that if each knew what the other had been told or promised, it could undermine the working of the Executive?

�For example, if Sinn F�in had secret promises on an amnesty, or dismantling operations against criminality in South Armagh, or on the Irish language, it could indeed destabilise the Executive.�

Mr Allister, who was a member of the DUP talks team at St Andrews but who publicly expressed reservations afterwards about the agreement, has been a constant critic of his former party�s decision to go into government with Sinn Fein and other parties.

In December he formed Traditional Unionist Voice which will face its first test at the ballot box next month in a battle against the DUP, Ulster Unionists, Sinn Fein, SDLP, Alliance and the Greens.

The MEP said the decision to refuse him the documents showed the public interest and the cause of open government had been relegated for political reasons.

�Surely, the public are rightly entitled to know what Her Majesty�s Government said or promised to each of the key parties in these secret letters which flowed at or from St Andrews?� he asked.

�I know from what the NIO has written to me that some of the documentation pertains to �issues that are still subject to discussion with the NI parties�.

�Thus I expect policing and justice is included, but has Her Majesty�s Government told the two parties the same thing or are they telling each what they want to hear. If they are, then that certainly could destabilise Stormont.

�Not being satisfied that the public interest is being served by the withholding of this documentation, I have lodged a formal request for a review and, ultimately, I will take this matter to the Information Commissioner.�

_________________
"N� lu�fimid faoi eason�ir, n� coirpigh sinne! �ireannaigh sinne! Sin anchoir in�r gcoinne..."
"We refuse to lie here in dishonor! We are not criminals, but Irishmen! This is the crime of which we stand accused..." ~ Bobby Sands

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]