VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, [4] ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 09:24:33 03/03/02 Sun
Author: Liz
Subject: It's all about balance and common sense. It seems that each side has to take things to extremes to make their own point and I don't think that really works. Lives really ARE at stake, and that is a very VALID issue. I don't think that the rebels would have had a shot in hell, against the British in 1776 had Peter Jennings been sitting in a tree next to Washington with a camera crew and a microphone..
In reply to: Joy 's message, "Hmm…I’m kind of torn on this. I do believe in the free press, but I think the public knows too much about government operations. Locations of troops, war strategies, and now this secret underground government somewhere on the East coast. Journalists and the government make it too easy for our enemies." on 06:47:22 03/01/02 Fri


[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

[> [> [> [> Oh, what you said about Jennings and an ABC camera crew is so true, but on the other hand, had there not been a free press, the Patriots may not have won the war. With the power of the press, they were able to get the support of fence-sitters in the colonies and around the world. Let's face it, what we have today is one hand washing the other, or shall we say one ungreased carrot shoved up the others backside. They use each other, and public gets screwed. But, as for me, give me the free press or give me death.. -- Lafaux, 10:48:10 03/03/02 Sun


[ Edit | View ]
[> [> [> [> [> No argument from me, I'm a big fan of the free press. I'm also a big fan of common sense though. You can bet your butt that there were no headlines, telling folks that they might have a little trouble getting tea, due to plans of insurrection in Boston Harbor with names, dates, and times. I do think that the press does know where to stop most of the time in regards to war, troop movements and such, which I think is all about common sense. -- Liz, 11:08:59 03/03/02 Sun


[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> [> [> [> I'm not so sure about this. Most countries didn't fight guerilla wars. Most of the battles of the revolutionary war were known about in advance. People were on nearby hillsides at Bunker Hill watching. -- Isabel, 15:55:44 03/03/02 Sun

I think that secrecy is a modern invention. And the government is to blame for the fact that people don't trust it anymore. I agree that there is too much attention to personal stuff, but public fraud is rampant. but I so think that the press is going overboard these days, and it's because people don't trust them anymore either. I think that is why they have been getting so intrusive.

I think that as a culture we have lost the distinction between secrecy and privacy. Privacy is as fundamental a right as free press. We have too little attention to privacy these days, IMO.


[ Edit | View ]


[ Contact Forum Admin ]

Forum timezone: GMT-8
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.