VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, [4] ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 07:58:48 03/29/02 Fri
Author: Lafaux
Subject: What other recourse is there? This man went to doctors for help, and knowing about the anthrax in that post office, they ignored his symptoms. I know that suing is not the only answer, but it does get the attention of certain professions that have individuals who are careless.
In reply to: CrazyCat 's message, "I am not at all surprised. People think suing makes everything right, while I think that sort of action should be reserved for special circumstances." on 06:55:40 03/28/02 Thu


[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

[> [> [> But the insurance company is not responsible, the doctor is! -- CC, 08:16:10 03/29/02 Fri

eom


[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> [> Also, I think that people think suing may make there pain go away, and it will not. If they are going to after someone, go after the doctor, or the government who tested there dogs before the postal workers. The insurance company did not misdiagnose him, what did they do? -- CC, 08:18:56 03/29/02 Fri

>eom


[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> [> But the insurance company assumes that responsibility when they take an HMO or an individual as client(s). They gamble on them, but patients should have to gamble with their lives. -- Lafaux, 11:17:00 03/29/02 Fri


[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> [> [> but patients should not have to gamble with their lives. -- Lafaux, 11:19:26 03/29/02 Fri


[ Edit | View ]


[ Contact Forum Admin ]

Forum timezone: GMT-8
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.