VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, [4] ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 11:32:43 05/18/02 Sat
Author: Cabbie
Subject: Lafaux ...
In reply to: Lafaux 's message, "Oh Cabbie, Please! You all yelled and screeched with disgust about Todd ever since he came back and sloughed off the existence of the troll. How many times have I seen, "I WOULDN'T HAVE THIS TODD FOR OUR GIRL"! Well, you're dying to get Todd for your girl anyway you can. Problem is, he doesn't want your girl!" on 11:08:26 05/18/02 Sat

I don't think you're a moron. So I apologize if you're offended by what I wrote (I told you NOT to be one ... not that you WERE one). I was speaking tongue in cheek and was still under the influence of Candy's post where she was referring to some group of people looking like morons.

Anyways ... I'm sort of done here ... I see all the same arguments going back and forth and my opinion is as firmly in place as when I started. NOBODY is in a position to claim some kind of superiority based on the stupid-ass storyline they've been given and based on THEIR interpretation of it. And they definitely cannot claim superiority because "we didn't act like THEY did."

All's well ... carry on :)

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

[> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> I don't give a damn who's "morally superior" If I wanted to be "morally superior", then I'd probably find something more worthy to do with my time then yammer about some damn soap opera! Different strokes for different folks, I guess. -- OTWB, 12:29:15 05/18/02 Sat

>I don't think you're a moron. So I apologize if
>you're offended by what I wrote (I told you NOT to be
>one ... not that you WERE one). I was speaking tongue
>in cheek and was still under the influence of Candy's
>post where she was referring to some group of people
>looking like morons.
>
>Anyways ... I'm sort of done here ... I see all the
>same arguments going back and forth and my opinion is
>as firmly in place as when I started. NOBODY is in a
>position to claim some kind of superiority based on
>the stupid-ass storyline they've been given and based
>on THEIR interpretation of it. And they definitely
>cannot claim superiority because "we didn't act like
>THEY did."
>
>All's well ... carry on :)


[ Edit | View ]


[ Contact Forum Admin ]

Forum timezone: GMT-8
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.