Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your
contribution is not tax-deductible.)
PayPal Acct:
Feedback:
Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):
| [ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, [4] ] |
[ Edit | View ]
[> [> [> [>
You ought to know the reaction to the last thing -- CC, 20:46:09 05/06/02 Mon
They will just use that last remark to chang the subject, and start calling T&Bers woman-haters. It is true, though, Tea is no mother. She had no problem leaving Starr, whom she claimed to love, whenever Todd did not do what she wanted.
[ Edit | View ]
[> [> [>
Whatever, Candy - this thread is quite unbelievable!! Why don't you just take this to MD? I can't defend LindaB's post as I don't know her intent or know what she was thinking when she posted it ... she obviously had reason to post in your topic ... so ... take this to her directly. -- Cabbie, 21:16:27 05/06/02 Mon
[ Edit | View ]
[> [> [> [>
Cabbie: Why would I want to take this to MD, knowing full well my very nice no flames "Momma got the Magic" post will be deleted?...CLICK -- Candy, 08:06:24 05/07/02 Tue
If you don't get it my friend far be it for me to try and explain it to you AGAIN for the umpteenth time. While I find your "defense" of your "gangbanging" friends admirable I can't help but wonder if instead of being part of the solution to the crap that goes on at that board you're part of the problem?? Call me clueless if you like (I've been called worse) I find it highly suspect that I post a very nice, no flames post over there and I'm immediately attacked (scroll down the page if you don't believe me..PS: Like I give a shit) Yet here you are defending a bunch of no principled, ignorant ho's that have always been easy "snark" pickins (see smells a rat post)Besides that, this is my board and this is the last stanza of the Todd wars and if I'm going to show my T&B ass I'd much rather do it in private (Unlike the majority of your oh so "classy" buds who whine and carry on about the injustice of it all and then have the unmitigated gall to wonder why they are NOT taken seriously or liked by ANYONE including TIIC) It's called COMMON FUCKING RESPECT when you give none be prepared to get none and it seems you and your "classy" buds should know that by now...JMNSHO, of course.
[ Edit | View ]
[> [> [> [> [>
Candy .... -- Cabbie, 09:02:30 05/07/02 Tue
You and I agreed ... we'd always stick up for our respective buddies. You asked me a question about LindaB - I answered (OBVIOUSLY the B doesn't stand for anything like you suggested) and I thought I was keeping it light!!! As I SAID, I can't defend Trog or LindaB on their posting in your post (I wasn't with them as they posted) - but I can tell you what I know of them personally. And my dealings with them have been fine - they're very outspoken and it makes for interesting discussion (and I get some laughs, too). That was my only point to YOU. I'm not sure how else I caused trouble here - I tried to keep it light, but others didn't want to keep it that way.
You take care, my dear friend. There's really not much more I can say.
[ Edit | View ]
[> [> [> [> [>
Don't sweat it Cabs, all's cool. You know how I loath the double standard and that board reeks of it, I've been given to understand that TIIC no longer go over there for "show input" and now I understand why....YIKES!!! -- Candy, 15:46:07 05/07/02 Tue
[ Edit | View ]
[> [> [> [> [>
Oh Candy, that was beautiful and so TRUE!!!! -- OTWB, 16:19:25 05/07/02 Tue
>If you don't get it my friend far be it for me to try
>and explain it to you AGAIN for the umpteenth
>time. While I find your "defense" of your
>"gangbanging" friends admirable I can't help but
>wonder if instead of being part of the solution to the
>crap that goes on at that board you're part of the
>problem?? Call me clueless if you like (I've been
>called worse) I find it highly suspect that I post a
>very nice, no flames post over there and I'm
>immediately attacked (scroll down the page if you
>don't believe me..PS: Like I give a shit) Yet here you
>are defending a bunch of no principled, ignorant ho's
>that have always been easy "snark" pickins (see smells
>a rat post)Besides that, this is my board and this is
>the last stanza of the Todd wars and if I'm going to
>show my T&B ass I'd much rather do it in private
>(Unlike the majority of your oh so "classy" buds who
>whine and carry on about the injustice of it all and
>then have the unmitigated gall to wonder why they are
>NOT taken seriously or liked by ANYONE including TIIC)
>It's called COMMON FUCKING RESPECT when you
>give none be prepared to get none and it seems you and
>your "classy" buds should know that by now...JMNSHO,
>of course.
[ Edit | View ]
[> [> [> [> [> [>
WB: You of all people know how I've always felt about MD (I did coin it Twitty City...
[ Edit | View ]
[> [> [>
This is what I have to say in defense of LindaB. (click) -- Lafaux, 13:34:53 05/07/02 Tue
[ Edit | View ]
[> [>
But the point of it is, Cabbie -- CC, 20:51:47 05/06/02 Mon
Is that when one of us did ever go into one, we were called low-class, hateful, mean people who ruined things for everyone else. So when we would put up our own topic to avoid the whining, we were still mean, negative beings who were told to quit posting those negative things. Plus when they do go into our topics, we do not try and say it is a good thing, the apathy thing and all that.
[ Edit | View ]
[> [>
LindaB's post had nothing to do with her hatred of Blair so what sense does that make? ~Llanviewer N/T -- Llanviewer, 21:02:53 05/06/02 Mon
eom
[ Edit | View ]
[> [> [>
As much sense as you and CC are making. -- Cabbie, 21:26:00 05/06/02 Mon
[ Edit | View ]
[> [> [> [>
Oh oh -what did I do to you Cabbie beside ask a question? It wasn't even mean spririted! Major meow! LOL!! -- Llanviewer, 21:34:51 05/06/02 Mon
eom
[ Edit | View ]
[> [> [> [> [>
No mean-spiritedness at all coming from me, Llanviewer. Just trying to walk a slippery slope here ... -- Cabbie, 21:46:44 05/06/02 Mon
[ Edit | View ]
[> [> [> [>
Could you clarify as to what is confusing? I see nothing confusing here. -- CrazyCat, 07:32:41 05/07/02 Tue
>eom
[ Edit | View ]
[> [>
No offense, Cabbie (really!!!), but you do have at least one nutcase over at THAT board. That would be Kelly. She is in a frickin' fantasyland. OK, no more naughty stuff. (eom) -- Philosopher, 22:35:35 05/06/02 Mon
[ Edit | View ]
[> [> [>
Ooooooh, I feel just like I did when I was in high school smoking in my bedroom...dirty naughty. But honest, I don't know Kelly from Adam, so she could be a perfectly normal person IRL (trying not to laugh...really). -- Philosopher, 22:38:13 05/06/02 Mon
[ Edit | View ]
[> [> [>
No offense taken at all, Phil ... I watched the Vagina Monologues the other night ... and according to the playright, the voices of all TWATS should be heard. So by all means, carry on!! -- Cabbie, 22:46:48 05/06/02 Mon
[ Edit | View ]
[> [> [> [>
Hey, I thought we were going to be civil to one another!!! (eom) -- Philosopher, 07:28:36 05/07/02 Tue
[ Edit | View ]
[> [> [> [> [>
Phil ... between me and you, I thought that was greatly civil!! :) -- Cabbie, 09:12:21 05/07/02 Tue
[ Edit | View ]
[> [> [> [>
What was the vagina monologues??? -- CC, 08:06:22 05/07/02 Tue
[ Edit | View ]
[> [> [> [> [>
An awesome play on the power of women ... I recommend it highly. It's on HBO and it's being performed in Los Angeles for a little longer - I'm not sure where it will play after LA. The play is also in book form, too. Very empowering piece for women about 'our private parts.' -- Cabbie, 09:10:01 05/07/02 Tue
[ Edit | View ]
|
Forum timezone: GMT-8 VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB: Before posting please read our privacy policy. VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems. Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved. |