VoyForums

[ VoyUser Login optional ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, [3], 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 07:49:59 07/27/06 Thu
Author: Steve in ATL
Author Host/IP: dragonfire8.delta.com / 205.174.22.28
Subject: The problem with the "natural" arguement

Predicated on the "B" sample coming back positive, which is most likely will (coming from the same urine test - and the testosterone test is pretty robust)...

First, he'll have to make the argument that this was a "natural" high (NPI). That's going to be hard to establish, as he's been tested in and out of competition for a decade now with no other positives. Access to prior testoserone levels from those tests will be critical, as it would be piossible to make a statistical arguement based on those numbers, provided that the data would suppor tsuch a conclusion (a natural positive test resulting from a high produciton of testosterone). I don't remember the numbers, but it's a very small percentage of people who can occasionally spike over the threshold that the UCI / WADA and other Feds use for the "positive" demarcation.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

[ Contact Forum Admin ]

Forum timezone: GMT-8
VF Version: 2.94, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2008 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.