VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, [6], 7, 8 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 08:57:08 09/10/04 Fri
Author: crit racer
Subject: Re: rice pudding under suspicion
In reply to: hallbrain 's message, "Re: rice pudding under suspicion" on 08:25:33 09/10/04 Fri

>"This is unfair! We deserts are tested more than any
>other food. I swear, I've been tested 46 times this
>year and never once came up positive!"
>
>- puddin'

Well this thread did result in some ads on the board for pudding.

But I agree that pudding is innocent until proven guilty. Maybe the Society for the Protection of Pudding should weigh in on this.

Can we generate some ads for rice cake, pie, and fruit cake for the Christmas and holiday season by using those terms here? What about Lego and Tonka toys?

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

[ Contact Forum Admin ]

Forum timezone: GMT-8
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.