VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, [8], 9, 10 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 07:20:15 04/16/12 Mon
Author: adamseve
Subject: Re: Replacing Candy with Jamie and so on...
In reply to: Rick 's message, "Replacing Candy with Jamie and so on..." on 03:03:30 04/10/12 Tue

Yes, Jamie was a bad choice. The character ranks with Laura. He just didn't fit in or add anthing.David Ladd from feet of clay would have been much better and had charisma with Hoss. Or they should have had Hoss marry and have a family and after Dan's death even more storylines could have openedup. Candy could have returned and married the widow. Joe could have remained the dashing bachelor. And there would have been real little Cartwrights to enjoy. adamseve

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

[ Contact Forum Admin ]

Forum timezone: GMT-8
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.