VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, [6], 7, 8, 9 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 22:20:29 07/08/02 Mon
Author: minelabmayer
Subject: Re: Iron ID vs. Discrimination
In reply to: Ralph 's message, "Iron ID vs. Discrimination" on 17:25:25 07/07/02 Sun

Hey Guys, thanks for the help.I just came in from a 4-day trip.You guys have alot of interesting views.There is alot of varibles that seem to make certain situations difficult with what you have to work with when detecting for gold. I
guess, what I'm saying is,it's like a doctor. There is no perfect detector science for every situation given. Its a calculated guess when using the Disc. function over a target that could be gold, especially in hot hot ground. Ralph, you put it in a perspective that just makes me have to dig alittle bit more LOL. I thought maybe we were more able to violate gravity completely when using the Iron ID. butten, but it always comes back to the law that says you don't get something for nothing.I do however believe technoloy will take in affect the complex varibles that will make this iron id. happen in every situaion in the gold field without losing small detectable gold and make it happen.I appriciate everyones input.I also understand now why Jim has sveral detectors.You do get some satisfaction from every detector in that certain situation,but not completely for all situations. That seems to be the understanding I get or recieve from everyone's imput.
Sincerly,

Mark

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]
[ Contact Forum Admin ]

Forum timezone: GMT-6
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.