VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, [7], 8, 9 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 22:40:38 06/05/02 Wed
Author: Bill(OR)
Subject: Re: Some thoughts on mineralization and "ground balancing"
In reply to: Ralph 's message, "Some thoughts on mineralization and "ground balancing"" on 18:15:08 06/05/02 Wed

Yeah GB doesn't do away with mineralization it just makes it invisible and " Ground Balancing" is a misnomer but the best term they could come up with at the moment. Ground Exclusion is somewhat of a better term but not as catchy as GB as it sounds much more technical. HAA. Good piece Ralphie.

Why not do one on the effects of mineralization on the different types of coils and the signal pattern they generate. This is a much misunderstood topic.

Bill

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

[ Contact Forum Admin ]

Forum timezone: GMT-6
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.