Date Posted:12:09:38 02/24/05 Thu Author: Sage Author Host/IP: cpe-69-202-25-105.nycap.res.rr.com / 69.202.25.105 Subject: But then again In reply to:
Sage
's message, "Gimme a break!" on 11:50:46 02/24/05 Thu
I would have to agree with this freeper comment:
"He is creating a moral conundrum for the pro-choice, pro-gay crowd."
The strategy extends well beyond that. In fact, the major fabric of the Leftist coalition - environmentalism, feminism and race baiting - is in danger here.
1. The environmentalists are in conflict because protecting the 'gay' gene carriers is anti-nature and prolonging a defective line. In effect, it is imposing genetic modification on natural selection.
2. The feminists are in conflict because the already acceptable genetic disease basis for abortion will be expanded, or not, to purely preferential choices if abortion is clearly sanctioned for reasons other than disease. The notion of killing children for the sake of characteristics will seriously harm their sale prospects to uncertain women about the 'right' to murder brown eyed girls in preference to blue eyed boys.
3. The race lobby won't dig this either. Since gays are already chewing into their turf with a jinn ed up claim to minority status, the open acknowledgment that preferential killing of babies based on superficial characteristics in order to develop a superior end product is the next step in readdressing the ultimate idea of eugenics.
This is good politics. This has opened a lot of ground that has heretofore been speculative. This Legislator deserves a big thanks for carrying the ball forward deep into RAT territory.
