Date Posted:23:39:12 01/01/02 Tue Author: cezoram Subject: Re: Hearken In reply to:
Glen
's message, "Re: Hearken" on 21:26:26 12/31/01 Mon
>>Glen, I gave you more credit than that. Did you
>>really believe that we thought that Lurker was
>>complimenting Cezoram. That's very funny! We knew
>>what he was doing. However, Cezoram chose to take his
>>wonderful words at face value.
>
>That's the problem.
Glen,
Problem? What problem? I thought that Lurker was very generous in his words to me. Are you jealous? You can't handle someone saying such kind words to me, can you? Envy will get you nowhere.
>>His latest scripture sure doesn't "fit" the situation
>>when it comes to Cezoram. It does, however, fit the
>>Community of Christ to a T.
>
>We disagree on this.
You disagree? Isn't that sweet? Would you care to elaborate? Anyone can disagree, but not everyone can analyze something and give educated reasons why they disagree.
>>If you can make a correlation between THAT scripture
>>and Cezoram, while NOT seeing that it speaks of what
>>is happening today in the Community of Christ, you
>>really don't have an idea of what it says.
>
>We disagree on this.
Again you disagree? Isn't that even sweeter? Still, I am waiting for your elaboration.
>>Who are the "foolish and blind guides" on this board?
>>Well, there are 2 that I can think of off hand, and
>>neither of them is Cezoram.
>
>We disagree on this, too.
>
>Love,
>Glen
You think I am a "foolish and blind guide"? How so? I am not the one who foolishly and blindly denies that Jesus is the Christ. I am not the one who foolishly and blindly rejects the scriptures and says that they are just made up by men. Who is really blind here??? I won't say his name, but his initials are Glen Perkins.
