Re: 2006 TC? - What Increased -- fifl

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 15:59:35 08/03/04 Tue
Author: John (Fargo Freeze)
Author Host/IP: 216.40.221.251
Subject: Re: 2006 TC? - What Increased
In reply to: FIFL Commish 's message, "Re: 2006 TC? - What Increased" on 12:20:52 08/03/04 Tue

Here's what Fargo's average increases look. The biggest thing to considers when looking at increases is that the higher your stat is already, the smaller the potential increase. Another consideration is potential caps. As I understand it, there are 'hidden' limits to any given players stats, that may or may not be represented in a players initial stats. That is, for players A and B, you could have the following starting SP stat and potential max SP stat.

Start Max
A 70 99
B 78 94

So you could see greater increases in player A as the seasons progress depending on how the TC is run.

=============================

QB 5.0
HB/FB 6.2
WR 7.7
C/G/T 9.8
K/P 9
DE/DT 9.25
LB 9.9
CB/S 9.75

=============================

>The 'problem' with the game, is that it does
>Percentage increases rather than a numbers increase.
>If an Offensive Lineman is at 650 overall and a
>Defensive Lineman is at 550 overall, after running a
>training camp with the same numbers (and same
>potentials) the Defensive Lineman would have a larger
>increase than the Offensive Lineman. This is the MAIN
>problem, and is why I have to from time to time do a
>defensive decrease.
>
>Because the game is not perfect, if we had Offensive
>Lineman at 650 matched up against a Defensive Lineman
>at 650, the Offensive guy would be murdered. The DL
>would have probably 25 sacks (no joke).
>
>Below are my average increases for each position.
>Maybe better than you, maybe worse, not sure.
>
>QB 7.0
>HB/FB 8.0
>WR 8.9
>C/G/T 7.2
>K/P 10.0
>DE/DT 9.7
>LB 10.0
>CB/S 10.0
>
>
>As you can see, I think we did do a good job in
>capping defense, as we have shaved the increase on
>Defense some... On average, looks like the defense
>caught up by a couple points, but clearly better than
>it has been in the past.
>
>If anyone else cares to do this same comparrison,
>please do so.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

I think my differences are a bit bigger -- Josh (Steel Valley), 20:35:07 08/03/04 Tue