Re: Individual TC -- fifl

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 10:20:55 08/04/04 Wed
Author: Mike
Author Host/IP: 132.206.81.198
Subject:

Re: Individual TC
In reply to: Jimmy 's message, "Individual TC" on 18:57:34 08/03/04 Tue

In response to a previous argument of Jimmy's against the 'protected lists', Fort Wayne DT Asa Francis ranted that the only guy Jimmy should put on his protected list is the Louisiana QB, because Fort Wayne's gunning for him in week 10.

Jimmy didn't respond, meaning that the threat from the formerly-low Fort Wayne didn't faze him.... or did it? This latest argument concerning his frustration with TC obviously means that DT Francis' threat has Louisiana a little scared....or else why would they be insisting on new ways to improve their team?!?!

Mike

>Other than drastic measures I've outlined in the past
>(cut the curve unilaterally to where the numbers were
>meant to be, like MAX high 70s low 80s... and no one
>is going to go there...sigh) individual TC is the ONLY
>way for GMs here-to-fore out of the loop to recoup
>losses over the past 3 or 4 seasons and continue to
>survive. This is not the VPNFL [which I EXTREMELY
>detest, but that's another story line] but it is
>becoming dangerously close. Given the slim margin now
>allocated to player increase, and the lack of control
>as to where these incerases take place, y'all have no
>choice. I see now why there was maximum support for
>the current system. I'm WAY down with that... in fact,
>I feel it's contra to what '97 is all about... and
>that is noy good. In short, a small group of GMs have
>taken advantage of statistical deficeincies in the
>FIFL that IMHO basterdize the intent of FBPRO '97. I,
>for one, challenge this basterdization, and demand
>individual TC (ITC) be the norm. Regardless, the
>damage has alraedy been done. Thoroughly disgusted,
>Jimmy, LBB.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Re: Individual TC -- John (Fargo Freeze), 23:07:17 08/04/04 Wed