Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your
contribution is not tax-deductible.)
PayPal Acct: 
Feedback: 
Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):
| 23/04/26 9:05pm | [ Login ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, [3] ] |
| Subject: POPE JOHN'S REVOLUTION | |
|
Author: Forum Admin |
[
Next Thread |
Previous Thread |
Next Message |
Previous Message
]
Date Posted: 02:00:09 04/21/02 Sun It is well known and superbly documented that a clique of liberal theologians (periti) and bishops hijacked Vatican Council II (1962-1965) with an agenda to remake the Church into their own image through the implementation of a "new theology." Critics and defenders of Vatican II are in agreement on this point. In his book 'Vatican II Revisited,' Bishop Aloysius J. Wycisodo (a rhapsodic advocate of the Vatican II revolution) declares with enthusiasm that "theologians and biblical scholars who had been 'under a cloud' for years surfaced as periti [theological experts advising the bishops at the Council], and their post-Vatican II books and commentaries became popular reading." He notes that "Pope Pius XII's encyclical Humani Generis (1950) had....a devastating effect on the work of a number of pre-conciliar theologians" and explains that "During the early preparation of the Council, those theologians (mainly French, with some Germans) whose activities had been restricted by Pope Pius XII, were still under a cloud. Pope John XXIII quietly lifted the ban affecting some of the most influential ones. Yet a number remained suspect to the officials of the Holy Office. Bishop Wycisodo sings the praises of triumphant progressives such as Hans Kung, Kark Rahner, John Courtney Murray, Yves Congar, Henri de Lubac, Edward Schillebeeckx and Gregory Baum, who had been considered suspect before the Council, but who are now the leading lights of post-Vatican II theology. In effect, those whom Pope Pius XII considered unfit to be walking the streets of Catholicism, were now in control of the town. And as if to crown their achievements, the Oath against Modernism was quietly suppressed shortly after the close of the Council. St. Pius X had predicted correctly. Lack of vigilance in authority had allowed Modernism to return with a vengeance. FOR HOW LONG WILL FAITHFUL CATHOLICS HAVE TO SUFFER FROM THE EVIL EFFECTS OF MODERNISM IN THE CHURCH IN OUR TIME ? http://homepage.ntlworld.com/j.caughey [ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ] |
| Subject | Author | Date |
| Re: POPE JOHN'S REVOLUTION | John Gregory | 11:58:03 10/23/02 Wed |
|
||