Re: ISRAEL BEHIND IRAQ ATTACK -- LET US REASON TOGETHER

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, [2] ]

Subject: Re: ISRAEL BEHIND IRAQ ATTACK

Author:
Jens Peter Reuss Christensen

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 01:48:22 04/09/03 Wed
In reply to: BRI 's message, "ISRAEL BEHIND IRAQ ATTACK" on 13:21:06 09/20/02 Fri

Is ISRAEL really behind the US/Iraq war ? If so they are doing a really lousy Job ! By preparing to come to ISRAEL with a political bill for the war , they will ( GOD WILLING ) be forced to pay a terrible price even if they get victory as seems likely. But what happens in Syria/Lebanon ?
>Proof Israel/Richard Perle
>Dictating War On Iraq?
>From Dick Fojut
>dfgraphics@gci-net.com
>9-11-2
>
>Jeff...
>
>BEFORE carpet bombing begins and tens of thousands of
>innocent Iraqi civilians become "collateral damage"
>dead, we should first consider the following:
>----------------------
>IS THERE PROOF America's proposed WAR AGAINST IRAQ is
>being dictated by the ISRAELI government in collusion
>with Defense Policy Board head Richard Perle and his
>band of ISRAEL-FIRST advisors surrounding President
>Bush?
>---------------------
>YES, according to Lyndon LaRouche who says he has
>PROOF and presents it in a PRESS RELEASE (see bottom),
>http://www.larouchepub.com/pr_lar/2002/090802pollard_af
>fr.html
>contending that Richard Perle and an Israeli Spy Ring
>network of "Pollard stay-behinds" inside the Bush
>Administration are behind the "urgent" drive to induce
>Bush and Congress to go to war against Iraq!
>---------------------
>According to LaRouche, the collusion was originally
>planned back in 1996, with Richard Perle proposing to
>then Prime Minister Netanyahu a NEW ISRAELI POLICY: *
>repudiating the Oslo Accords, * a PERMANENT Israeli
>occupation of the entire West Bank and Gaza, *
>elimination of Saddam Hussein, * to be followed by
>overthrowing or destabilizing the governments of
>Syria, Lebanon, Saudi Arabia, and Iran. The document,
>"A Clean Break: A New Strategy for Securing the
>Realm," (FOR Israel) was prepared for the Jerusalem
>and Washington, D.C.-based Institute for Advanced
>Strategic and Political Studies (IASPS), one so-called
>"independent" organization now being quoted in the
>media giving "reasons" to attack Iraq. Perle and his
>"Israel-First" crowd are OBSESSED with pressuring Bush
>and Congress to adopt and carry out their Israel-Likud
>"Clean Break" policy.
>----------------------
>(Excerprt from LaRouche Press Release): "Perle most
>recently staged the July 10, 2002 Defense Policy Board
>session, which demanded the purging of the Joint
>Chiefs of Staff of all opponents of the Iraq war, and
>called for a U.S. military occupation and takeover of
>the Saudi oil fields and a total break with the House
>of Saud-just as his July 1996 IASPS "Clean Break"
>study had proposed."
>-----------------------
>(Read the LaRouche EIR Press Release at bottom and
>judge for yourself if there is sufficient proof for
>Congress to hold IMMEDIATE PUBLIC HEARINGS to
>investigate LaRouche's serious charges about CRIMINAL
>BEHAVIOUR inside Bush's administration.)
>http://www.larouchepub.com/pr_lar/2002/090802pollard_af
>fr.html
>-------------------------
>(ADDITIONAL): In the UK Independent 10 Sept 2002,
>ROBERT FISK makes similar accusations about ISRAELI
>LOBBYISTS, now dictating policy inside the Bush
>administration, in the following scathing article...
>BUSH IS INTENT ON PAINTING ALLIES AND ENEMIES IN THE
>MIDDLE EAST AS EVIL
>http://news.independent.co.uk/world/middle_east/story.j
>sp?story=332011
>
>(Excerpts): Only The Nation among all of America's
>newspapers and magazines has dared to point out that a
>large number of former Israeli lobbyists are now
>working within the American administration and the
>Bush plans for the Middle East - which could cause a
>massive political upheaval in the Arab world - fit
>perfectly into Israel's own dreams for the region.
>The magazine listed Vice-President Dick Cheney - the
>arch-hawk in the US administration - and John Bolton,
>now under-secretary of state for Arms Control, with
>Douglas Feith, the third most senior executive at the
>Pentagon, as members of the advisory board of the
>pro-Israeli Jewish Institute for National Security
>Affairs (Jinsa) before joining the Bush government.
>Richard Perle, chairman of the Pentagon's Defence
>Policy Board, is still an adviser on the institute, as
>is the former CIA director James Woolsey. ...Mr Perle
>advises the Defence Secretary, Donald Rumsfeld...
>President Bush, of course, will not be talking about
>the influence of these pro-Israeli lobbyists when he
>presents his vision of the Middle East at the United
>Nations on Thursday.
>-----------------------------
>Note: The above JINSA organization was identified by
>LaRouche as a lobby for the Israeli Army, the IDF
>(Israeli Defense Forces.) and Ariel Sharon. The above
>(biased) officials, strongly dedicated to promoting
>Israel (and its army), should not be tolerated inside
>our government!
>-----------------------------
>Posted by Dick Fojut
>Dick Fojut Graphics dfgraphics@gci-net.com
>Tucson, AZ
>----------------------------------
>----------------------------------
>PRESS RELEASE
>from the website of Lyndon LaRouche's
>EXECUTIVE INTELLIGENCE REVIEW
>(Released by the LaRouche in 2004 committee on Sept.
>8)
>------------------
>THE POLLARD AFFAIR NEVER ENDED!
>http://www.larouchepub.com/pr_lar/2002/090802pollard_af
>fr.html
>
>Lyndon LaRouche reports that there is now firm
>evidence that the ongoing drive to induce President
>George W. Bush to launch a war against Iraq, is a 1996
>Israeli government policy that is being foisted on the
>President by a nest of Israeli agents inside the U.S.
>government. This Israeli spy network inside the United
>States was unable achieve their objective until
>President Bush was entrapped by the events of Sept.
>11, 2001 and the falsified accounts of those events
>provided by this foreign intelligence apparatus, and
>lured over to their policies. Lyndon LaRouche demands
>to know: Is this not the motive that explains the who
>and why of the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001? LaRouche
>demands an immediate Congressional investigation, to
>help purge the U.S. government of this foreign
>intelligence apparatus, which attempted, with the 9/11
>events, to seize control over U.S. foreign policy. The
>network of Pollard "stay-behinds" inside the Bush
>Administration is engaged in a witting hoax, to induce
>the President and the U.S. Congress to go to war.
>
>When you read the summary evidence below, you will
>certainly share Lyndon LaRouche's conclusion that all
>of these people must be immediately fired from their
>Administration posts, and that the U.S. Congress must
>launch public hearings to get to the bottom of this
>criminal scheme.
>
>The summary facts are as follows:
>
>On July 8, 1996, Richard Perle, now the Chairman of
>the Defense Policy Board, an advisory group that
>reports to Deputy Defense Secretary Paul Wolfowitz,
>presented a written document to Israeli Prime Minister
>Benjamin Netanyahu, spelling out a new Israeli foreign
>policy, calling for a repudiation of the Oslo Accords
>and the underlying concept of "land for peace"; for
>the permanent annexation of the entire West Bank and
>Gaza Strip; and for the elimination of the Saddam
>Hussein regime in Baghdad, as a first step towards
>overthrowing or destabilizing the governments of
>Syria, Lebanon, Saudi Arabia, and Iran. The document
>was prepared for the Jerusalem and Washington,
>D.C.-based Institute for Advanced Strategic and
>Political Studies (IASPS), a think tank financed by
>Richard Mellon-Scaife. The report, "A Clean Break: A
>New Strategy for Securing the Realm," was co-authored
>by Perle; Douglas Feith, currently the Assistant
>Secretary of Defense for Policy; David Wurmser,
>currently special assistant to State Department chief
>arms control negotiator John Bolton; and Meyrav
>Wurmser, now director of Mideast Policy at the Hudson
>Institute.
>
>Two days after he received the foreign policy
>blueprint from Perle, Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu
>delivered a speech before a joint session of the U.S.
>Congress, which strongly echoed the IASPS outline. The
>same day, the Wall Street Journal published excerpts
>from the IASPS document, and the next day, July 11,
>1996, the Journal editorially endorsed the Perle
>document.
>
>Beginning in February 1998, the British government of
>Prime Minister Tony Blair launched a concerted effort,
>in league with the Netanyahu government in Israel, and
>the Perle Israeli agent-of-influence networks inside
>the United States, to induce President William Clinton
>to launch a war against Iraq, under precisely the
>terms spelled out for Netanyahu in the "Clean Break"
>paper. The war was to be launched, ostensibly, over
>Iraq's possession of "weapons of mass destruction."
>United Nations weapons inspectors were, at this time,
>still on the ground inside Iraq.
>
>To buttress the war drive, British Foreign Secretary
>Robin Cook issued an official lying "white paper" on
>the Iraqi drive to obtain WMD. On Feb. 19, 1998,
>Richard Perle and former Congressman Stephen Solarz
>released an "Open Letter to the President," demanding
>a full-scale U.S.-led drive for "regime change" in
>Baghdad. The dangerously incompetent military scheme
>for the overthrow of Saddam that was published in the
>Open Letter, has been recently revived by the
>Perle-led network of "chickenhawks" in the office of
>Secretary of Defense-but has been summarily rejected
>by the Joint Chiefs of Staff. Among the signators on
>the original Perle-Solarz letter were the following
>current Bush Administration officials: Elliott Abrams
>(National Security Council), Richard Armitage (State
>Department), John Bolton (State Department), Doug
>Feith (Defense Department), Fred Ikle (Defense Policy
>Board), Zalmay Khalilzad (White House), Peter Rodman
>(Defense Department), Donald Rumsfeld (Secretary of
>Defense), Paul Wolfowitz (Defense Department), David
>Wurmser (State Department), and Dov Zakheim (Defense
>Department).
>
>President Clinton rejected the February 1998 demand
>for war, sending both Netanyahu and Blair into fits of
>rage.
>
>On Aug. 6, 1998, Angelo Codevilla, the Washington,
>D.C. co-director of IASPS (along with David Wurmser),
>penned an op-ed in the Wall Street Journal, demanding
>the freeing of convicted Israeli spy Jonathan Pollard.
>Codevilla argued that Pollard had been right to pass
>U.S. classified material to Israel, because of the
>threat posed by Saddam Hussein. Days later, two
>members of the Netanyahu cabinet contacted Vice
>President Al Gore, demanding Pollard's release.
>
>After again rejecting the Netanyahu and Blair demands
>for war on Iraq in November 1998, President
>Clinton-under the impeachment onslaught, led by the
>Mellon-Scaife-funded apparatus-finally caved in and
>authorized Operation Desert Fox in December 1998, as
>he was returning on Air Force One from a visit to
>Israel. But the 70 days of bombardment did not
>eliminate the Saddam Hussein regime, and the issue
>remained dormant for the next three years ... until
>Sept. 11, 2001.
>
>Within moments of the 9/11 attack on Washington and
>New York, the same Pollard-linked American networks
>who had designed the Netanyahu foreign policy were on
>the warpath, demanding that President Bush go to war
>against Iraq, despite the fact that, to this day,
>there is no plausible evidence linking Iraq to the
>September 2001 irregular warfare attacks. The Sharon
>government in Israel instantly declared that the
>attack had been ordered by Saddam Hussein, and called
>for massive retaliation against Baghdad.
>
>On Sept. 22, 2001, Deputy Defense Secretary Paul
>Wolfowitz made a feverish pitch for war on Iraq at a
>Camp David meeting with President Bush and most of the
>Cabinet. Wolfowitz had been brought into the inner
>circle of George W. Bush a year before the 2000
>Presidential elections, at the initiative of former
>Secretary of State George Shultz. By 1999, Wolfowitz
>and Condi Rice had become co-responsible for pulling
>together the Bush campaign foreign policy and national
>security team, which Ms. Rice dubbed "The Vulcans."
>Wolfowitz immediately brought "X Committee" Israeli
>agent-of-influence Richard Perle into the inner
>sanctum, from where he has been peddling the
>Netanyahu-Israeli foreign policy agenda from day one.
>Perle most recently staged the July 10, 2002 Defense
>Policy Board session, which demanded the purging of
>the Joint Chiefs of Staff of all opponents of the Iraq
>war, and called for a U.S. military occupation and
>takeover of the Saudi oil fields and a total break
>with the House of Saud-just as his July 1996 IASPS
>"Clean Break" study had proposed.
>
>This is but the briefest of summaries of the massive
>evidence in hand. The current campaign to induce
>President Bush and the U.S. Congress into a war with
>Iraq, one that would surely unleash the "Clash of
>Civilizations," is a direct continuation of the
>Pollard affair. President Bush is being pressured-from
>inside his own national security apparatus-to adopt an
>Israeli Likud foreign policy! What nation is dictating
>policy to the United States? This is a scandalous
>hoax, far worse than the Gulf of Tonkin affair of the
>late 1960s.
>
>From the point that Perle, Feith, the Wurmsers, et al.
>first delivered the "Clean Break" policy to Netanyahu,
>this crowd has been obsessed with inducing the United
>States government to adopt and implement it. All prior
>efforts failed, until Sept. 11, 2001 created a new
>context for reviving and pushing it-under the guise of
>the "war on terrorism." Does this raise questions
>about the true, mysterious authors of the 9/11 attack?
>What are the links between the events of Sept. 11 and
>the subsequent unabated drive for war against Iraq?
>
>From Perle and Feith, to others pressing the Netanyahu
>scheme from outside the Administration-including Frank
>Gaffney, Steven Bryen, and Michael Ledeen-the entire
>crew were among the leading suspected Israeli spies,
>tasking Jonathan Pollard to steal the most precious
>national security secrets of the U.S.A., from inside
>the Reagan-Bush national security apparatus. They
>avoided prosecution, and later emerged as "The
>Vulcans," assigned to "teach" President Bush the ins
>and outs of foreign and national security policy.
>Isn't it time that these co-conspirators joined
>Jonathan Pollard behind bars? Isn't it time for
>President Bush to give these clowns a "September
>Surprise"?
>
>Released by the LaRouche in 2004 committee on Sept. 8.
>
>
>
>Email This Article
>
>
>
>
>MainPage
>http://www.rense.com

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]