| Subject: Re: open circle |
Author:
nosey
|
[
Next Thread |
Previous Thread |
Next Message |
Previous Message
]
Date Posted: 11:47:52 11/10/11 Thu
In reply to:
annoyed at all the lies from daulby made up by Wendy
's message, "Re: open circle" on 10:13:27 11/10/11 Thu
Hi Consider this, I just had to write in response to your comment, and I hope you have considered carefully what you were going to write because it is in my opinion you haven’t , whether this was to try and frighten people off I couldn’t say, however you have written on here , “this 'mentally ill' person is a friend of theirs and that she also has an injunction out against you? my question would have to be “HAVE YOU SEEN THIS SO CALLED INJUNCTION? or ARE YOU JUST GOING ON HEARSAY?”, now if you have actually seen this injunction then you would notice there is a reference number top left hand side corner when it was issued, what date it was issued, by what Judge it was issued and court number.
of course the dates times etc would have to have been made before the first comment concerned person wrote on here, however it really doesn’t matter if this was issued afterwards, as you have stated by your own hand “Wendy because she would not stop your ex from attending the church – but then again be fair, she did not stop you either did she? if this is the case, and as you have said clearly that Wendy and you are aware of this injunction against concerned person then you have certainly proven Wendy has even deviated not only from the SNU rules but even a court injunction by allowing concerned person into the church on this knowledge alone. and it is her duty as president to protect the public, I personally think you’re telling some untruths here, as if the injunction stated that concerned person must not be with in so many feet or in any vicinity of the person involved etc or to have any contact by either them or third party than my friend Wendy and the committee have knowingly put this person in danger and would be in very serious trouble.
So unless you have actually seen this “injunction” have actually seen what the Judge has ordered then by right both should have been asked not to attend the Church, as their dispute is involving the committee, but like I said I really think this is just another untruth.
[
Next Thread |
Previous Thread |
Next Message |
Previous Message
]
| |
Feedback: 