Re: Arthur Findlay College Tutor -- Premier Spiritualist Forum: The UK's Longest Established!

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, [7], 8, 9, 10 ]

Subject: Re: Arthur Findlay College Tutor

Author:
Not Amused

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 17:05:51 05/20/15 Wed
In reply to: Amused 's message, "Re: Arthur Findlay College Tutor" on 11:01:32 05/20/15 Wed

You seem to misunderstand what I posted. Whatever issues you have with KW have nothing to do with this thread.

The law applies equally to everyone. I did not say otherwise, so I'm not sure where you're coming from.

Intentional fraud is when you tell someone you cannot walk, but in reality you can walk, run and work-out in the gym. As was the case we are now discussing.

And not paying tax is a conscious decision, something you just don't forget to consider when you are making money from being an international medium, with all the workshops, tutoring, circles, readings, etc. How can you estimate such earnings in a predominately cash business? Maybe look at the assets? Like the big luxury house that they were living in?

You cannot say that they were not professionals in their field. You cannot say that they were the victims of circumstance.

But I do apologise if you think that I was abusing you in my last post. That was not my intention and I'm sorry if my post came across as something as strong as abuse.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]