Re: That's OK : ) -- Warrior Central Message Board

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, [4] ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 23:03:26 07/21/02 Sun
Author: The Rockers2k
Author Host/IP: spider-te044.proxy.aol.com / 152.163.195.194
Subject: Re: That's OK : )
In reply to: EnLaFiestaMandoYo 's message, "That's OK : )" on 03:21:14 07/21/02 Sun

To me age doesnt really matter.It matters if you still feel and know you can still do it.Come on I remeber looking at a documentary of the history of Pro Wrestling and Lou Thesz
was in it and I think the narrator said he didnt retire wrestling until the age of 74.Also at his 70's he was a world heavyweight champion.So I don't really care Warrior
could still keep wrestling to me when he's 90 as long as he knows what he is doing also if he's physicaly in shape for his age and won't be too intense in the ring.So The Ultimate Warrior Lives on the Ultimate Journey 4Liiiife!!

>Hey, don't worry about it! :) When I first read that
>article in 1998, I did notice they had his age at 38,
>so I figured, hmmmmm, his birthday would only be a
>month away so he would've turned 39, so his birth year
>must be 1959. Now that I think about it, it sounds
>just about right to me. Oh, well, it doesn't matter
>to me how old Warrior is; to me he will always be
>Warrior, even when he's 90 years old! :)
>
>Sasha Elizabeth
>
>
>>I've always gone with Warriors birthdate being in '57
>>because most of the bigger websites report it as such.
>>However, in the article I've just added to the site.
>>it states Warriors age as being 38. The article is
>>from May 1998 so that means Warrior has just turned 43
>>and not 45 as I've previously stated. It also means
>>that Warrior's Birth Year is neither '57 or '61 but
>>actually in 1959.
>>Sorry!
>>SIB

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Re: That's OK : ) -- Jeff, 19:25:10 07/22/02 Mon
- Re: That's OK : ) -- Danny, 09:30:23 07/24/02 Wed