| Subject: What A croock of crap |
Author:
Ralph
|
[
Next Thread |
Previous Thread |
Next Message |
Previous Message
]
Date Posted: 18:24:54 03/20/03 Thu
In reply to:
Peter Oswald
's message, "Bush' Vendetta" on 14:39:47 03/20/03 Thu
>A Scientific Theory To Predict Future Actions of US
>President Bush
>
>The UN has failed to keep world peace by failing to
>prevent the US from starting a war of aggression
>against Iraq. The US President George W. Bush has
>violated international law and by that declared war
>against democracy practised in the institution of the
>UN and the UN Security Council. That makes him no
>longer a democratic president but a dictator on a
>larger scale, a world wide scale. This goes far beyond
>hegemony.
>His behavior gives further indication of dictatorship:
>
>1. His definition of friend and allie is a state that
>will follow his will without questioning and without
>discussion or disagreement.
Right, France's behavior with all of it's contracts for Oil and Duel use chemicals with Saddam has acted as an Ally. There was not a word about Germany nor Russia, and Bush just forced his way into Turkey after they denied the US use of ground facilities
>2. He tries to legitimize his actions by forging proof
>(as UN Inspector Hans Blix has brought into the open).
>Clearly showing that he has no real proof.
Sure, That document that Blix refered to was produced by another country, not the United States so Bush had no hand in the production of a Forgery. Also, that was also only one document, there was more documents than that which implicated Saddam's involvement with Nuclear and Biochemical programs
>3. He sways opinion by repeating the same lie over and
>over again until the people believe it. For example:
>He keeps on proclaiming Iraq supports al Qaeda
>terrorists and by that is linked to the 9/11-bombing.
>This has been prooven wrong by several security
>agencies. Al Qaeda has been supported by a few saudis,
>not the sunits. The sunits (a certain group within the
>muslim world the Iraqi leadership belongs to) are
>their declared enemy.
Don't you ever get tired of being wrong, While there is no evidence of a Direct link between the two where Saddam has a vote or say in the targets nor timing of attacks, James Woosley, Clinton's CIA Head testified in Sept. That there is an indirect link between al-Qaeda and Iraq. There is a law suit in New York that was filied against Bin Laden in 1998 which names the Iraqi government as a co-defendant. Last week, the Spanish arrested a member of al-Qaeda who backs up the Czech Ministers story about Atta and an Iraqi intelligence officer meeting in Prague which is backed up on his hard drive. Saddam gave a 707 fuselage to al-Qaeda and as Woosley and Powell have testified provided weapons training in 2000.
>4. He unmasks his long pretended goal, the disarmament
>of the Iraq, as unimportant. He stops the disarmament
>by forcing the UN-inspectors who are controling the
>process out of Iraq.
Since Blix admitted that Iraq was dragging their feet on cooperation, how where the inspectors controlling it the process? ANd it was the members of the Security council decision to make, Or did you want the inspections to continue while IRAQ Chaired the Disarmament Committee and became Blix's Boss next month.
>5. He has given ultimata he knew the Iraqi leadership
>could not meet: Disarming in a too short period of
>time, going into exile while a few thousand
>accomplices of the regime would prevent that.
They were supposed to disarm in 45 days in 1991, so 12 years is not long enough, Milosovich managed to do it, As have others
>6. He invented a doctrine of preventive defense that
>would not stand any ground in front of a US-court, if
>a thug or murderer would plead to it.
Actually Clinton proposed pre-emption in the Clinton Doctrine.
>7. He has already split the spoils of war under his
>priviledged sponsors in the oil industry unmasking his
>true interest.
As Tony Blair announced today it will be placed in a UN recievership
>8. He has favored close friends in the oil industry
>with preverential treatment like allowing oil
>drillings in Alaska and passing tax deferments for the
>wealthy.
It's an across the board tax cut at a set Percentage, which means everyone that PAys taxes gets one. What you don't pay taxes and won't get one? Second, Those drillings have not been approved of yet, and therefore no contarcts have been granted yet.
>9. He is trying to decrease freedom of speech by
>putting pressure on film companies. A black list has
>shown ist first effect at the Oscars where Dustin
>Hoffman and Richard Gere were not invited at first.
When was the last time a conservative actor got a good role unless they were instrumental in producing the flick themselves. I think you forgot that Hollywood already has a blacklist for conservatives.
>10. He is trying to sidetrack the people from
>increasing unemployment rates, from a recession in US
>economy and from his inabillity to change that.
We are not in a recession and continuing to say it will not change that fact since we do have positive growth in the economy at the time I am posting this.
>11. He is refusing prisoners of war at Guantanamo Bay
>rights they are entitled to under the Geneva
>Convention, but even though dares to call Iraq an
>“enemy who has no regards for conventions of war rules
>and morality“.
Care to give an example where that has happened at camp X-Ray where if it occured, it was not broiught to light by one of the international commissions that are monitoring conditions there
>12. He tryed to prevent a proper count of the
>presidential election votes in Florida.
Back to this again, Look, Palm Beach county changed the standards 5 times to maximize the number of "new" votes for Gore. and the scheme that the SCOFL came up with violated the equal Protection clause of the Constitution. Check out <a rel=nofollow target=_blank href="http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/cgi-bin/getcase.pl?court=US&navby=case&vol=000&invol=00-949.">http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/cgi-bin/getcase.pl?court=US&navby=case&vol=000&invol=00-949.</a> So it must be that a Proper recount would only be one where the results that you wanted was a correct one. And Gore would not have needed Florida if he had won his "Home State" of Tennessee. Talk about Rejection by those who know you best.
>13. He is not the elected president of the majority of
>the people of the United States of America.
Neither was Bill Clinton, who did not win the majority of the popular vote in either election. Bush won the election every President has won the election, By winning the Electorial College Vote. Nor in what was essentially a two man race the third to win the Presidency without winning the overall Popular vote.
>
>The US under Bush who definitely shows features of a
>dictator have become a potential threat to long term
>world peace, free markets and predictible
>international relations all absolutely essential to a
>thriving world economy.
>Any country – asian, african, european – has to face a
>possible military action, if it does not comply with
>the wishes of the US – today it is oil in Iraq,
>tomorrow it might be water in Norway. Countries world
>wide, friendly or unfriendly to the US will take
>precautions. New alliences will be formed, forces
>increased to meet the US-american threat. This will
>make the world a more dangerous place by far.
>To prevail US interests by any means will only lead to
>short term success for US economy. Like in any other
>dictatorship only a few people around the leader will
>profit. General US economy can not succeed isolated
>from the rest of the world and Bush has started
>alienating the US from the rest. This will soon lead
>to isolation, if he is not stopped.
You have completely Flipped Out and are absolutely paraniod.
[
Next Thread |
Previous Thread |
Next Message |
Previous Message
]
| |
Feedback: 