How frustrating . . . -- Notes from Zarahemla Political Forum

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 16:24:28 06/13/07 Wed
Author: Jay
Subject: How frustrating . . .

I've been to every website that I can find where there are LDS people stumping for Mitt Romney. I have written a lot of emails to the hosts of such websites and have made numerous pleas to them asking why they would support a person who would not, could not honor his oath of office. As soon as we start discussing law, the Constitution, the 12th article of faith, or D&C 98, they refuse to debate me anymore. There isn't one person I have found who will discuss this with me. Not one. Everyone contends that he honors the law (Constitution) until I point out the many areas where he doesn't, and then it's over. No reply. I just get ignored.

Why is this not important to LDS stumpers for Mitt?

Jay

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

It's probably time to face it... -- Chuck in ND, 20:54:02 06/13/07 Wed
- Perhaps they don't want to discuss it because... -- Eppy, 16:51:20 06/17/07 Sun
  - I'm not sure about that... -- TastingTheBlood, 18:59:06 06/17/07 Sun
    - No...Hillary is definately worse!!!! -- Eppy, 19:42:32 06/17/07 Sun
      - Hm... -- TastingTheBlood, 14:59:38 06/18/07 Mon
        The way I see it . . . -- Jay, 15:05:19 06/18/07 Mon
        Yes...But there are some evils that are not as powerful as others! -- Eppy, 04:24:40 06/19/07 Tue
        Given their track records . . . -- Jay, 05:01:56 06/19/07 Tue
        TastingTheBlood -- TastingTheBlood, 06:27:43 06/19/07 Tue
        On the other hand . . . -- Jay, 12:51:34 06/19/07 Tue
        ROFL.......not on your life -- stan, 12:58:57 06/21/07 Thu
        So which is a greater evil? -- Chuck in ND, 17:38:19 06/21/07 Thu
        Hm........ -- TastingTheBlood, 08:07:00 06/22/07 Fri
        don't worry -- stan, 09:17:05 07/18/07 Wed
Many years ago I read about the Constitution -- Cricket, 21:28:02 06/13/07 Wed
- Re: Journal of Discourses -- Deborah, 03:01:56 06/14/07 Thu
  - Thoughtfully responding -- Cricket, 08:25:34 06/14/07 Thu
    - Numbers have made predictions... -- Deborah, 01:45:29 06/17/07 Sun
      - "google" in December 21 2012, and see how much -- stan, 15:20:00 06/17/07 Sun
        Is that the -- Cricket, 19:06:16 07/14/07 Sat
        yes......AND the astrophycial calculation -- stan, 09:19:06 07/18/07 Wed
  - about the only people "allowed" to quote -- stan, 15:18:11 06/17/07 Sun
    - Wait just a moment -- Cricket, 19:29:50 06/17/07 Sun
      - REMEMBER, we are still in a kingdom where -- stan, 13:02:09 06/21/07 Thu
      - I'm really curious -- TastingTheBlood, 15:43:01 06/21/07 Thu
        short story -- Cricket, 17:56:01 06/21/07 Thu
Humans are tribal -- Deborah, 03:18:31 06/14/07 Thu
It's kinda funny, though . . . -- Jay, 19:40:09 06/14/07 Thu
- I'd say that's sad -- Chuck in ND, 19:16:22 06/16/07 Sat
  - It's clear you are not a Bush supporter -- Deborah, 01:27:25 06/17/07 Sun
    - You make a good connection there -- Chuck in ND, 12:52:49 06/17/07 Sun
      - Thinking about this more -- Deborah, 01:10:03 07/07/09 Tue
  - Cite your sources about stifling free speech -- Cricket, 13:13:04 06/17/07 Sun
    - How about eye witness? -- Chuck in ND, 17:37:25 06/17/07 Sun
      - How about Cindy Sheehan? -- Beetle Bailey, 20:00:51 06/22/07 Fri
        Hey, Beetle... -- Deborah, 00:11:03 06/26/07 Tue
        terms -- Cricket, 11:34:33 06/27/07 Wed
        With a bow -- Deborah, 00:36:12 06/28/07 Thu
      - hoping this will post -- Cricket, 05:56:54 06/23/07 Sat
    - Small disagreement if I may -- Deborah, 02:34:21 06/18/07 Mon
      - to add to that... -- Cricket, 08:59:48 06/18/07 Mon
        When I'm lost in the desert, contemplating climate change... -- Deborah, 00:49:01 06/19/07 Tue
        I believe in equal opportunity teasing -- Cricket, 05:58:35 06/23/07 Sat
        Speech is free (in flower-power sense) unless or until it does harm ;-) -- Deborah, 23:44:33 06/25/07 Mon
  - "Awaken to OUR AWFUL situation" -- stan, 15:15:11 06/17/07 Sun
    - Not being a "Smarty-pants Deb," I promise! -- Deborah, 03:42:01 06/18/07 Mon
    - You would be an interesting person to mee, Stan! : ) (NT) -- TastingTheBlood, 15:01:48 06/18/07 Mon
      - Will take some heavy duty heart-deflecting kevlar specials... -- Deborah, 00:58:18 06/19/07 Tue
        "Kelvar"? -- stan, 12:55:54 06/21/07 Thu
- The Constitution" was written for -- stan, 15:12:19 06/17/07 Sun
prejudice........the most -- stan, 15:09:07 06/17/07 Sun