VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Login ] [ Main index ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1[2]3 ]


[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: Thu November 27, 2003 20:46:00
Author: 丞相
Subject: Re: o0o )~*
In reply to: 丞相 's message, "Re: o0o )~*" on Thu November 27, 2003 20:45:13

先生之思考方式著實異於常人。’興之所至’正是使預測一個人變得困難的原因,而先生又說’個別個案影響太少’即是’興之所至’對群體行為的影響比個人行為小,也則是預測群體的行為應該比較容易。那為何又會得出’若是單一人的話....可以.若是全人類的話.....難’的結論呢?
或許是因為大家的’興之所至’並不相同之過。我是以’興之所至’代表不可預測的因素。舉個例子,我平常上學是使用路線甲的,但我今天忽然改用路線乙。那這個改變到底是不可預測的興之所至還是必然的結果呢?即如果完全相同的情況重復發生無限次(假設記憶並不存在)那我會否依然會忽然想改用路線乙並使之實行還是不可預測的因素會起作用而會使我有不同的行為呢?

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]


Replies:



Post a message:
This forum requires an account to post.
[ Create Account ]
[ Login ]

Forum timezone: GMT+7
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.