VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Login ] [ Main index ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1[2]3 ]


[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: Thu January 01, 2004 10:23:50
Author: Liberal Christian
Subject: 聖經無誤論失效之後...

聖經無誤論失效之後---重新考慮從閱讀聖經得出的教訓的可信性及權威

聖經無誤論的作用是保證我們從聖經中提取的教訓無誤.但我們無法保證閱讀無誤,即是我們無法保證從聖經中提取的教訓無誤,聖經無誤論因而失效.

雖然傳統上聖經被譽為”神的默示,”但可惜我們今天無法保證從聖經中提取的教訓無誤.結果,我們需要重新考慮從閱讀聖經得出的教訓的可信性或權威.我們也需要重新考慮從閱讀聖經得出的教訓與人類從其他途徑獲得的知識及教訓的相對可信性及相對重要性.聖經的歷史悠久,在不少猶太教及基督宗教信徒的心目中享有崇高的地位,也可說是當今西方世界的道德基礎,聖經的重要性不容忽視.另一方面,世界其他歷史悠久的大宗教也有她們的經典,我們實在很難找到理由把聖經置於那些經典之上.唯一的方法是從認信出發,仍然堅信”聖經乃神的默示,”而且是神對人類的”特殊啟示,”有別於大自然、良知、甚致其他宗教等的”普通啟示,”而且比後者更清晰,因而更可信、更具權威性.但如此作有機會把”聖經乃神的默示”變成一項盲目的信念.話說回頭,信徒提出過一些證據支持這項信念,如果你接受它們,這項信念未必是完全盲目的.聖經的可信性及權威是敏感的課題,重新考慮時要慎重行事,不能把傳統一下子抹殺,似乎我們第一項要決定的是自己的認信.從那裡,一切其他的工作才有一個清晰穩固的平臺展開.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]


Replies:



Post a message:
This forum requires an account to post.
[ Create Account ]
[ Login ]

Forum timezone: GMT+7
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.