VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Login ] [ Main index ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1[2]3 ]


[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: Mon January 12, 2004 17:29:17
Author: 丞相
Subject: 這本來就不是類比論證
In reply to: 淇少俠 's message, "不準確的類比論證" on Sat January 10, 2004 20:47:24

我本來就不是想把這作比喻。
這其實是兩個論點。
如果是我的寫作能力太差使你誤解,我願意道歉。

因為我是以
'假設禁止偷竊的法例,防盜設施和保安等全部取消,試想社會上會有多少偷竊行為呢?人們不偷竊並不是由於他們真的關心被害者的損失而是想避免自己承受偷竊失敗的後果'
'人們定立法律並不是為了制止自己傷害別人而是制止別人傷害自己'
作類比論證。

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Post a message:
This forum requires an account to post.
[ Create Account ]
[ Login ]

Forum timezone: GMT+7
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.