Re: PS -- James Elite Board 2001! version 2.0

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, [3], 4 ]

Subject: Re: PS

Author:
Terry

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 20:05:07 10/05/00 Thu
In reply to: James 's message, "Re: PS" on 23:37:55 10/04/00 Wed

Well obviouslly it would be long before the child is born. Before it devolps a brain wound be a good idea. Before it actually has the capability of living life (as in has a heart, brain, and needed life systems). Im not a doctor so I wouldnt have an actually dead on answer for this question. But it is America and women should have the choice. The Abortion pill is a good idea because they can do it without the added emotional stress and can have it done right away before the baby has all these things. I dont know much about the pill either though so once again I can not give a 100% solid answer.

> True, but if you killed a baby at 6 months and 29 days
> that would be murder right? My question is when and
> where do we draw the line? Who cares if the baby knows
> it's alive, I mean WE know it is right? And we know
> that it is destine to become an adult (if all goes
> well) so why not give it the right to life liberty and
> pursuit of happiness?
>
> I mean is the baby any different the day before birth
> vs the day after? is it any more or less alive? Where
> do we draw that line?
>
>
>
> > Oh... and if I wanted to cut my arm off, I am damn
> > sure gonna do it and no one is going to stop me. My
> > arm is alive. It may not BECOME its own person in 9
> > months, but it is still alive and part of me.
> >
> > > But also look at it this way.... a baby is inside
> the
> > > mother and therefor part of HER body until birth.
> > Then
> > > until the 7th month of being outside of mommy, the
> > > baby doesnt even realize that it is its own person!
> > > Allyson is just now figuring out that she is her
> own
> > > person. Its neat to watch them go through that
> month.
> > > So the baby doesnt even know it isnt itself until 7
> > > months after birth.
> > >
> > >
> > > > It seems for convenience sake that a wanted baby
> is
> > > > "alive" and an unwanted baby is an "unviable,
> dead,
> > > > tissue mass."
> > > >
> > > > I say it can't be both ways. It's either alive or
> > > not.
> > > > And according to Biology, even a singular cell is
> > > > considered alive.
> > > >
> > > > > if a baby is "not alive" until birth, why does
> > > > someone
> > > > > who kills a pregnant lady and her baby also
> dies
> > > > > guilty of TWO murders?

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]