VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 12[3]4 ]
Subject: No, you can change minds....


Author:
Terry
[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]
Date Posted: 20:07:34 10/05/00 Thu
In reply to: James 's message, "My point is this..." on 23:46:23 10/04/00 Wed

You enducate others to whats going on in the most unbiased way you can and let us mill it over and mabey you will change minds. I beleive that the whole birth canal at 9 months is wrong. Cut and dry. Before 3 months should be the line you speak of.

And on the argumnent that babies are gods creation... so are chickens and you EAT those. Have you even gotten an egg and cracked it an a partial chicken fell out of it? Gross. But still... Tommy has a damn good point.

> I am sure the points could be argued back and forth
> forever. What I want to do however, is to put a higher
> value on life than we have today. I mean shit there
> are people who think a baby can be aborted in the
> birth canal and it's still okay. Which right now it is
> legal, but what miraculous thing happens in the seven
> inches of birth canal that makes a baby go from a dead
> tissue mass to a living breathing baby?
>
> I mean please. There has to be a line drawn on that
> issue. But not like I'll change anybody's mind really,
> so I'll drop it.
>
> > Terry,
> > I totally agree. As far as I am concerned the fetus
> is
> > not any different than a chicken egg embryo or any
> > other reptilian fetus before that fist four months.
> > The fetus duing some of that period even has a tail
> > and looks similar in certain charachterstics to many
> > other species of life.
> > So to me abortion during that very early period is no
> > different than flushing a spoiled chicken egg down
> the
> > toilet.
> > Peace out
> > Tommy
> > > Never said it wasnt alive. I will not address that
> > > issue. I think that having an abortion after a
> > certain
> > > time frame is wrong. If your gonna have one, have
> it
> > > way before the baby is fully developing. Im talking
> > > when it is still the size of a quarter. This 4th
> > month
> > > and beyond abortian stuff is shitty.
> > >
> > >
> > > > if a baby is "not alive" until birth, why does
> > > someone
> > > > who kills a pregnant lady and her baby also dies
> > > > guilty of TWO murders?

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]


[ Contact Forum Admin ]


Forum timezone: GMT-5
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.