Hugh Danig now -- <font size = "4">The Drunks Bar </font size "4">

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Main index ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, [4], 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 12:59:29 08/31/03 Sun
Author: Hugh Danig
Subject: Hugh Danig now
In reply to: SM78 's message, "Rush? What?" on 22:37:34 08/27/03 Wed

-"Oh, and fuck you, you mushy ass-faced mutant!

BTW, that was a courtesy insult to see if you will respond with a pulse."-

You are right. It would be hard to compete with your wit and command of the language.

-"Smug Baptists will say, "Well the Catholics are a cult so of course Jesus isn't there to protect the kids."

Oh?

So if a kid isn't a Baptist, then Jesus won't protect them? And I assume that no Baptists have ever molested children?
Religion can be such a sickening thing."-

I have many friends who are Baptist. They have and never would have said what you "quoted" them as saying. However, the fact remains that YOU presented the Baptist argument. (just like Rush does the liberals)
Since you have presented yourself too stupid to understand the comparison, the above quote might help. It was taken from your post above. Since you did make up the opposing argument, wouldn't that make you the "sickening thing?"

Hugh Danig

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Hugh Jasswhype -- SM78, 08:13:35 09/14/03 Sun