There is no Zone of Privacy -- <font size = "4">The Drunks Bar </font size "4">

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Main index ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, [5], 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 15:24:10 06/30/03 Mon
Author: The Honorable Antonin Scalia
Subject: There is no Zone of Privacy
In reply to: NKLS Cody 's message, "Scott's hypocracy" on 13:14:07 06/30/03 Mon

The majority of SCOTUS (6/3) argued that a private home constitutes a so-called "zone of privacy" that the State has no right to intrude upon, surveill, or control. In my dissenting opinion -- which Chief Justic Rehnquist joined --I said that the notion of a "zone of privacy" was yet another Court-invented right that could conceivably allow people to argue that anything occurring in a home is protected. Hence, we could have drug selling, abortion, pedophilia, zoophilia and even the horrirfic crime of Mormonism practiced in homes under the banner of a "zone of privacy."

The slippery slope applies, for once we allow homosexual sodomites to sodomize each other in a home, then where does it stop America, where does it stop? Now, we can allow heterosexual married couples to engage in sodomy because as SCOTUS ruled in Lewis-vs-The Drunks Bar, the matter is one of, "the gender and not the orifice," the female rectum being "fair game" for penetration by an engorged phallus whereas the male rectum is not. In Lewis, the majority in fact described the male orifice as "gross", this although Justice Kennedy suspiciously demurred in the minority opinion by calling it, "hot and tasty." That thought makes me puke and want to punch that little faggot and his Jew girlfriend Ginsberg.

The home, like the illict male butt, is not a zone of privacy. After SCOTUS is all conservative, we will uphold laws that make queers criminals, imprison feminists, and kill all those who do not worship Jesus Christ. We are taking America back. And don't kid yourself: We only pay lip service to the Jews because Jesus makes us. In real life, they too will become criminals in God's New America!!!

Oh, and by the way: KKK ALL THE WAY!!!

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Well, we see where Cody is coming from. -- ST, 19:26:57 06/30/03 Mon

News for Scott -- NKLS Cody, 11:19:58 07/01/03 Tue

You know nothing. -- ST, 15:56:22 07/01/03 Tue
- Correct! I know nothing b/c I know you -- NKLS Cody, 19:58:27 07/01/03 Tue
  - You still know nothing. -- ST, 20:16:46 07/01/03 Tue